IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i8p3478-d1124759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Rheological Models on Measurements of Shear-Thinning Fluid Flow in Smooth Pipes

Author

Listed:
  • Abdalsalam Ihmoudah

    (Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
    College of Engineering, Wadi Alshatti University, Alshatti P.O. Box 68, Libya)

  • Abdelsalam Abugharara

    (Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, NL A1C 5S7, Canada
    Faculty of Energy and Mining, Sebha University, Sebha P.O. Box 18758, Libya)

  • Mohammad Azizur Rahman

    (Petroleum Engineering, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha 23874, Qatar)

  • Stephen Butt

    (Faculty of Engineering & Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. Johns, NL A1C 5S7, Canada)

Abstract

The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of rheological models of shear-thinning fluids and their estimated parameters on the predictions of laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow. The investigation was carried out through experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies in horizontal pipes (diameters of 19.1 mm and 76.2 mm). Six turbulent models using Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes equations in CFD_ANSYS Fluent 19.0 were examined in a 3D simulation followed by comparison studies between numerical and experimental results. Regarding results of laminar regions in power-law rheology models, Metzner and Reed presented the best fit for the pressure loss and transitional velocity. For the turbulent region, correlations observed by Wilson and Thomas as well as Dodge and Matzner had good agreement with the experimental results. For Herschel–Bulkley fluids, pressure losses and transitional regions based on a yielded region were examined and compared to the experimental results and the modified Slatter Reynolds number, where the results provided good estimation. For both pipe diameters, the Slatter model was the best fit for pressure losses of Herschel–Bulkley fluids in the turbulent regime. Furthermore, when comparing k-omega and k-epsilon turbulence models to the power-law behaviour, numerical studies delivered the most accurate results with fluids that have a higher behaviour index. However, the error percentage significantly increased at a higher shear rate in the Herschel–Bulkley fluids with a greater yield stress effect. Moreover, the modified Herschel–Bulkley viscosity function by Papanastasiou was implemented in the current CFD study. This function was numerically stabilized, devoid of discontinuity at a low strain rate, and more effective in transitional regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdalsalam Ihmoudah & Abdelsalam Abugharara & Mohammad Azizur Rahman & Stephen Butt, 2023. "Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Effect of Rheological Models on Measurements of Shear-Thinning Fluid Flow in Smooth Pipes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3478-:d:1124759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3478/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/8/3478/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ravi Singh & Ramadan Ahmed & Hamidreza Karami & Mustafa Nasser & Ibnelwaleed Hussein, 2021. "CFD Analysis of Turbulent Flow of Power-Law Fluid in a Partially Blocked Eccentric Annulus," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Arild Saasen & Jan David Ytrehus, 2020. "Viscosity Models for Drilling Fluids—Herschel-Bulkley Parameters and Their Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Eric Cayeux & Amare Leulseged, 2020. "The Effect of Thixotropy on Pressure Losses in a Pipe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-23, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camilo Pedrosa & Arild Saasen & Jan David Ytrehus, 2021. "Fundamentals and Physical Principles for Drilled Cuttings Transport—Cuttings Bed Sedimentation and Erosion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Mahmoud Khalifeh & Larisa Penkala & Arild Saasen & Bodil Aase & Tor Henry Omland & Knut Taugbøl & Lorents Reinås, 2020. "Gel Pills for Downhole Pressure Control during Oil and Gas Well Drilling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Meng-Ge Li & Feng Feng & Wei-Tao Wu & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2020. "Numerical Simulations of the Flow of a Dense Suspension Exhibiting Yield-Stress and Shear-Thinning Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Hanieh K. Foroushan & Bjørnar Lund & Jan David Ytrehus & Arild Saasen, 2021. "Cement Placement: An Overview of Fluid Displacement Techniques and Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-33, January.
    5. Roxana P. F. de Sousa & Glauco S. Braga & Raphael R. da Silva & Giovanna L. R. Leal & Júlio C. O. Freitas & Vivian S. Madera & Alfredo I. C. Garnica & Fabiola D. S. Curbelo, 2021. "Formulation and Study of an Environmentally Friendly Microemulsion-Based Drilling Fluid (O/W) with Pine Oil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:8:p:3478-:d:1124759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.