IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p2013-d1072435.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Tight Sandstone: A Case Study for Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Dong

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, China National Petroleum Corporation, Beijing 100083, China
    College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhilong Huang

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Jinlong Chen

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Tianjun Li

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Jing Zhao

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Yongshuai Pan

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Tong Qu

    (College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China
    State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resource and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

Various experiments, including routine petrophysical measurements, thin section and scanning electronic microscope (SEM), high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), were performed to characterize the microscopic pore structure of tight sandstone in the Huagang Formation (E 3 h), Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin, China. Specifically, NMR was used to investigate the dynamic variation of fractal dimensions during centrifugation, and the comparison of HPMI and NMR were used to clarify the difference of fractal dimensions. The results showed that there were four types of pores observed in thin section and SEM images: primary intergranular pores, intergranular dissolution pores, intragranular dissolution pores, and micropores within clay aggregates. The geometric shape and pore size of different pore types showed huge differences, indicating the formation of complex and diverse pore structures in the E 3 h formation. The flow capability of the reservoir was dominated by large pores, while the storage capacity was determined by small pores. The dynamic variation of fractal dimensions calculated by NMR data showed the water residing in the pore structure with low fractal dimensions was removed preferentially, and the pore structure of the resided water was always more complicated than the pore structure of removed water, which indicated the flow capability of the reservoir was affected by the complexity of the pore structure. Based on the comparison of the fractal dimension data from HPMI and NMR, it was found that the variation trends of the fractal dimensions were consistent, as the radius of the pore throat increased, the fractal dimensions increased, and the pore structure became more complicated. Both fractal dimensions of macropores (D mac ) and movable-fluid pores (D mov ) can reflect the flow capability of reservoir effectively, but the correlations between fractal dimensions from HMPI and NMR were poor, which could be due to the different working mechanism in these methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Dong & Zhilong Huang & Jinlong Chen & Tianjun Li & Jing Zhao & Yongshuai Pan & Tong Qu, 2023. "Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics of Tight Sandstone: A Case Study for Huagang Formation in the Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2013-:d:1072435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2013-:d:1072435. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.