IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1689-d1061876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review of Different Methods for Identification of Transients in Pressure Measurements by Permanent Downhole Gauges Installed in Wells

Author

Listed:
  • Boyu Cui

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Lejun Chen

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Nan Zhang

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Anton Shchipanov

    (NORCE, Norwegian Research Center, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

  • Vasily Demyanov

    (Institute of GeoEnergy Engineerin, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK)

  • Chunming Rong

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

Permanent downhole gauges (PDG) are massively installed in injection and production wells operated in different industries such as oil and gas, geological CO 2 storage, and the geothermal industry. These gauges provide a vast amount of real-time pressure measurements. The pressure measurements may be divided into periods with a predominantly monotonic change of pressure in response to a sudden change of rate, called transients. These transients are caused by well operations, such as variation of injection or production rate and well shut-ins. Transient identification is one of the important steps in processing and interpreting the PDG data. Traditional transient identification is performed by processing and analyzing with human involvement, which is a step in post-operation well analysis. In modern well surveillance technology, permanent and reliable data transmission from the wellbore to the surface provide the possibility to analyze well performance in real time or proactively. So automated transient identification is a practical demand, but a challenge at the same time. This article starts with the definition of a transient, then reviews and compares seven methods for transient identification proposed by previous works available in the literature. A comparative analysis of these methods is carried out accounting for the detection algorithm and procedure, results of testing, and general positive and negative sides of performance and application of these methods. The results of this review facilitate further developments of field data interpretation techniques by the R&D community and academia and may help in the selection of a proper method for further application in well surveillance workflows developed in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Boyu Cui & Lejun Chen & Nan Zhang & Anton Shchipanov & Vasily Demyanov & Chunming Rong, 2023. "Review of Different Methods for Identification of Transients in Pressure Measurements by Permanent Downhole Gauges Installed in Wells," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1689-:d:1061876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1689/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1689/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1689-:d:1061876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.