IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p8085-d1301146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Investigation of IOR Potential in Shale Oil Reservoirs by Surfactant and CO 2 Injection: A Case Study in the Lucaogou Formation

Author

Listed:
  • Yaoli Shi

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Changfu Xu

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Heng Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Hongxian Liu

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Chunyu He

    (State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Jianhua Qin

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Baocheng Wu

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Yingyan Li

    (Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay 834000, China)

  • Zhaojie Song

    (Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

The current oil recovery of the Lucaogou shale oil reservoir is predicted to be about 7.2%. It is crucial to explore improved oil recovery (IOR) technologies, and further experimental and field research needs to be conducted to study the complex mechanism. In this study, laboratory experiments were carried out to investigate the performance of one-step and multi-step depletion, CO 2 huff-n-puff, and surfactant imbibition based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The sweep efficiencies were assessed via NMR imaging. In addition, hybrid methods of combining surfactant with CO 2 huff-n-puff and the performance of injection sequence on oil recovery were investigated. The experimental results indicate that oil recoveries of depletion development at different initial pressures range from 4% to 11%. CO 2 huff-n-puff has the highest oil recovery (30.45% and 40.70%), followed by surfactant imbibition (24.24% and 20.89%). Pore size distribution is an important factor. After three more cycles of surfactant imbibition and CO 2 huff-n-puff, the oil recovery can be increased by 11.27% and 26.27%, respectively. Surfactant imbibition after CO 2 huff-n-puff shows a viable method. Our study can provide guidance and theoretical support for shale oil development in the Lucaogou shale oil reservoir.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaoli Shi & Changfu Xu & Heng Wang & Hongxian Liu & Chunyu He & Jianhua Qin & Baocheng Wu & Yingyan Li & Zhaojie Song, 2023. "Experimental Investigation of IOR Potential in Shale Oil Reservoirs by Surfactant and CO 2 Injection: A Case Study in the Lucaogou Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8085-:d:1301146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8085-:d:1301146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.