IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p8063-d1300108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geological and Geochemical Responses to Productivity of CBM Wells in the Baiyang River Block of the Southern Junggar Basin, China

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Sun

    (PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Langfang 065007, China)

  • Shuling Tang

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shu Tao

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shida Chen

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yuanhao Zhi

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bin Zhang

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yijie Wen

    (School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The southern Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, has abundant coalbed methane (CBM) resources. Currently, the Baiyang River development pilot test area (BYR block for short) in the Fukang east block has achieved large-scale CBM development, but the productivity characteristics and its controlling factor are still unclear. Based on the field production data of the BYR block and experimental tests, this paper summarizes the gas and water production characteristics and presents the analysis results of the geological and geochemical responses to the productivity of CBM wells. The productivity of CBM wells in the BYR block was generally characterized as medium-to-low yield. The productivity was jointly controlled by the burial depth, structure condition, thickness and number of co-production coal seams, and hydrogeological conditions. The gas production first increased and then decreased with the increase in the burial depth of the coal seam, and a burial depth between 750 and 1000 m was the most beneficial to increasing the gas production due to the good gas preservation conditions and suitable permeability and stress conditions. The total thickness of the co-production coal seams had a positive effect on the productivity of gas wells, but the productivity was also affected by the number of co-production coal seams and interlayer interference. In the BYR block, the co-production of the nos. 41 and 42 coal seams was the most favorable combination form for CBM drainage. The productivity of CBM wells had a good response to the Na + , K + and HCO 3 − concentrations but a poor response to δD-H 2 O and δ18O-H 2 O. Based on the concentrations of the main ions and TDSs of the coal seam water, a productivity response index δ * was established, and there was a good positive correlation between the productivity and δ *.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Sun & Shuling Tang & Shu Tao & Shida Chen & Yuanhao Zhi & Bin Zhang & Yijie Wen, 2023. "Geological and Geochemical Responses to Productivity of CBM Wells in the Baiyang River Block of the Southern Junggar Basin, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8063-:d:1300108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/8063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:8063-:d:1300108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.