IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i24p7937-d1295304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

KPI Extraction from Maintenance Work Orders—A Comparison of Expert Labeling, Text Classification and AI-Assisted Tagging for Computing Failure Rates of Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Marc-Alexander Lutz

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Joseph-Beuys-Straße 8, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

  • Bastian Schäfermeier

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Joseph-Beuys-Straße 8, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

  • Rachael Sexton

    (National Institute for Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA)

  • Michael Sharp

    (National Institute for Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA)

  • Alden Dima

    (National Institute for Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA)

  • Stefan Faulstich

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Joseph-Beuys-Straße 8, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

  • Jagan Mohini Aluri

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Energy Economics and Energy System Technology, Joseph-Beuys-Straße 8, 34117 Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

Maintenance work orders are commonly used to document information about wind turbine operation and maintenance. This includes details about proactive and reactive wind turbine downtimes, such as preventative and corrective maintenance. However, the information contained in maintenance work orders is often unstructured and difficult to analyze, presenting challenges for decision-makers wishing to use it for optimizing operation and maintenance. To address this issue, this work compares three different approaches to calculating reliability key performance indicators from maintenance work orders. The first approach involves manual labeling of the maintenance work orders by domain experts, using the schema defined in an industrial guideline to assign the label accordingly. The second approach involves the development of a model that automatically labels the maintenance work orders using text classification methods. Through this method, we are able to achieve macro average and weighted average F 1 -scores of 0.75 and 0.85 respectively. The third technique uses an AI-assisted tagging tool to tag and structure the raw maintenance information, together with a novel rule-based approach for extracting relevant maintenance work orders for failure rate calculation. In our experiments, the AI-assisted tool leads to an 88% drop in tagging time in comparison to the other two approaches, while expert labeling and text classification are more accurate in KPI extraction. Overall, our findings make extracting maintenance information from maintenance work orders more efficient, enable the assessment of reliability key performance indicators, and therefore support the optimization of wind turbine operation and maintenance.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc-Alexander Lutz & Bastian Schäfermeier & Rachael Sexton & Michael Sharp & Alden Dima & Stefan Faulstich & Jagan Mohini Aluri, 2023. "KPI Extraction from Maintenance Work Orders—A Comparison of Expert Labeling, Text Classification and AI-Assisted Tagging for Computing Failure Rates of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7937-:d:1295304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7937/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/24/7937/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:24:p:7937-:d:1295304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.