IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i21p7348-d1270923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

RANS Prediction of Losses and Transition Onset in a High-Speed Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Rosafio

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10124 Torino, Italy)

  • Gustavo Lopes

    (Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Waterloosesteenweg 72, 1640 Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium
    Department of Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering, University of Liège, Allée de la Découverte 9, 4000 Liège, Belgium)

  • Simone Salvadori

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10124 Torino, Italy)

  • Sergio Lavagnoli

    (Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Waterloosesteenweg 72, 1640 Sint-Genesius-Rode, Belgium)

  • Daniela Anna Misul

    (Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10124 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Current trends in aero-engine design are oriented at designing high-lift low-pressure turbine blades to reduce engine weight and dimensions. Therefore, the validation of numerical methods able to correctly capture the boundary layer transition at cruise conditions with a steady inflow for high-speed blades is of great relevance for turbine designers. The present paper details numerical simulations of a novel open-access high-speed low-pressure turbine test case that are performed using RANS-based transition models. The test case is the SPLEEN C1 cascade, tested in transonic conditions at the von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics. Both physics-based and correlation-based transition models are employed to predict blade loading, boundary layer characteristics, and wake development. 2D simulations are run for a wide range of operating conditions ranging from low to high transonic Mach numbers (0.7–0.95) and from low to moderate Reynolds numbers (70,000–120,000). The γ - R e ˜ θ t transition model shows a good performance over the whole range of simulated operating conditions, thus demonstrating a good capability in both reproducing blade loading and average losses, although the wake’s width is underestimated. This leads to an overestimation of the total pressure deficit in the center of the wake which can exceed experimental measurements by more than 50%. On the other hand, the k - ν 2 - ω model achieves satisfactory results at Ma 6 , i s = 0.95, where the boundary layer state is affected by the presence of a weak shock impinging on the blade suction side which thickens the boundary layer, leading to a predicted shape factor equal to five, downstream of the shock. However, at low and moderate Mach numbers, the k - ν 2 - ω model predicts long or open separation bubbles contrary to the experimental findings, thus indicating insufficient turbulence production downstream of the boundary layer separation. The slow boundary layer transition in the aft region of the suction side that is exhibited by the k - ν 2 - ω model also affects the prediction of the outlet flow, featuring large peaks of a total pressure deficit if compared to both the experimental measurements and the γ - R e ˜ θ t predictions. For the k - ν 2 - ω model, the maximum overestimation of the total pressure deficit is approximately 60%.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Rosafio & Gustavo Lopes & Simone Salvadori & Sergio Lavagnoli & Daniela Anna Misul, 2023. "RANS Prediction of Losses and Transition Onset in a High-Speed Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7348-:d:1270923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/21/7348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:21:p:7348-:d:1270923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.