IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i18p6566-d1238262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Index, Evaluation Model, and Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Power Information System under Classified Protection 2.0

Author

Listed:
  • Gangjun Gong

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Qinglin Yuan

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jiaxuan Yang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Bo Zhou

    (Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311599, China)

  • Zeming Lv

    (State Grid Dalian Changxing Island Lingang Industrial District Power Supply Company, Dalian 116300, China)

  • Haixia Yang

    (Beijing Engineering Research Center of Energy Electric Power Information Security, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Mingfeng Xu

    (State Grid Dalian Changxing Island Lingang Industrial District Power Supply Company, Dalian 116300, China)

Abstract

Aiming at the problems of the low integration of the current power information system security assessment method with classified protection 2.0, strong subjectivity, and the vague quantification of objective indexes, this article proposes to establish a safety index system suitable for the electric power information system with the existing safety inspection standards for power systems on the basis of the classified protection 2.0 evaluation system. Additionally, it quantifies each index through a quantitative method combining subjective and objective methods and uses the analytic hierarchy process entropy method to obtain the combined weight of the evaluation index system. Finally, this paper summarizes the expert scores and the graded protection evaluation reports of the six systems into the original data for comprehensive weight calculation and analyzes the rationality of the weight change. The comparison and analysis of the closeness of the TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) and the evaluation score of the equal guarantee have confirmed the scientificity and rationality of the evaluation model. It provides a reasonable logical idea for the implementation of the classified protection 2.0 system in the power information system.

Suggested Citation

  • Gangjun Gong & Qinglin Yuan & Jiaxuan Yang & Bo Zhou & Zeming Lv & Haixia Yang & Mingfeng Xu, 2023. "Safety Index, Evaluation Model, and Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Power Information System under Classified Protection 2.0," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6566-:d:1238262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/18/6566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:18:p:6566-:d:1238262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.