IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2022i1p222-d1014524.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a Pipeline with an Orifice

Author

Listed:
  • Danni Zhao

    (Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing 100082, China)

  • Chende Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Zhengguang Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, China Nuclear Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518172, China)

  • Xixi Zhu

    (Institute of Thermal Science and Technology, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Yaru Li

    (Institute of Thermal Science and Technology, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Xiangyu Chi

    (Institute of Thermal Science and Technology, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

  • Naihua Wang

    (Institute of Thermal Science and Technology, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China)

Abstract

Countercurrent flow limitation (CCFL) refers to an important class of gravity-induced hydrodynamic processes that impose a serious restriction on the operation of gas–liquid two-phase systems. In a nuclear power plant, CCFL may occur in the liquid level measurement system where an orifice is applied in the pipeline, which may introduce error into the level measurement system. CCFL can occur in horizontal, vertical, inclined, and even much more complicated geometric patterns, and the hot-leg channel flow passage has been widely investigated; however, a pipeline with variable cross-sections, including an orifice, has not yet been investigated. An experimental investigation has been conducted in order to identify the phenomenon, pattern, and mechanism of CCFL onset in this type of geometry. Both visual and quantified experiments were carried out. A high-speed camera was applied to capture the flow pattern. Visual experiments were implemented at atmospheric pressure, while quantified pressurizer experiments were implemented at higher pressures. It was determined that if the condensate drainage is low and the liquid level is also low, with a stable stratified flow upstream of the orifice, there is no oscillation of the differential pressure. However, at higher condensate drainage levels, when the liquid level increases, a stratified wavy flow occurs. One of these waves can suddenly rise upstream of the orifice to choke it, which subsequently gives rise to differential pressure across the orifice, with periodic variation. This pattern alternately features stratified flow, stratified wavy flow, and slug flow, which indicates the occurrence of CCFL. The CCFL occurring under these experimental conditions can be expressed as a Wallis type correlation, where the coefficients m and C are 0.682 and 0.601, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Danni Zhao & Chende Xu & Zhengguang Wang & Xixi Zhu & Yaru Li & Xiangyu Chi & Naihua Wang, 2022. "Countercurrent Flow Limitation in a Pipeline with an Orifice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:222-:d:1014524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/222/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/222/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:222-:d:1014524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.