IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3417-d810325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tuscaloosa Marine Shale: Seal or Source? Petrophysical Comparative Study of Wells in SE Louisiana and SW Mississippi

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Mariana Ruse

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Mehdi Mokhtari

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA)

  • Lenissongui Yeo

    (Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

Abstract

The Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) is a versatile Late Cretaceous shale formation present in central and SE Louisiana and SW Mississippi, which drew attention because of the various roles played within the Tuscaloosa Group. In this paper, it is debated whether the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale can act as a source, reservoir, or seal all throughout the shale play or only in certain areas. Well log and core data from Adams County, Mississippi, are compared to data from East Feliciana Parish in Louisiana. Conclusions were drawn based on the results of well log analysis, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), porosity–permeability measurements, programmed pyrolysis, and fracture analysis. It was shown that the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale interval in SE Louisiana consists of important amounts of calcite, exhibits multiple natural fractures, has porosity values as high as 9.3%, and shows a TOC content of up to 2.8 wt%. On the other hand, samples from a well at the Cranfield field, MS, are characterized by considerably lower TOC values of around 0.88 wt%, porosities between 0.33% and 4%, and no serious fracturing. The formation demonstrates better reservoir and source potential in SE Louisiana and reliable CO 2 sealing capacity in SW Mississippi. The analysis presented in this paper represents a holistic approach to the characterization of shale formations, is applicable to other plays around the world, and can be used as an integral part of CO 2 sequestration or hydraulic fracturing programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Mariana Ruse & Mehdi Mokhtari & Lenissongui Yeo, 2022. "Tuscaloosa Marine Shale: Seal or Source? Petrophysical Comparative Study of Wells in SE Louisiana and SW Mississippi," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3417-:d:810325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3417/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3417/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Natasha Trujillo & Dylan Rose-Coss & Jason E. Heath & Thomas A. Dewers & William Ampomah & Peter S. Mozley & Martha Cather, 2021. "Multiscale Assessment of Caprock Integrity for Geologic Carbon Storage in the Pennsylvanian Farnsworth Unit, Texas, USA," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Silvana Fais & Giuseppe Casula & Francesco Cuccuru & Paola Ligas & Maria Giovanna Bianchi & Alberto Plaisant & Alberto Pettinau, 2019. "A Contribution to the Geological Characterization of a Potential Caprock-Reservoir System in the Sulcis Coal Basin (South-Western Sardinia)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-37, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William Ampomah & Brian McPherson & Robert Balch & Reid Grigg & Martha Cather, 2022. "Forecasting CO 2 Sequestration with Enhanced Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-7, August.
    2. Shanpo Jia & Caoxuan Wen & Xiaofei Fu & Tuanhui Liu & Zengqiang Xi, 2022. "A Caprock Evaluation Methodology for Underground Gas Storage in a Deep Depleted Gas Reservoir: A Case Study for the X9 Lithologic Trap of Langgu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Pål Østebø Andersen, 2023. "Editor’s Choice: Advances in Carbon Capture Subsurface Storage and Utilization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-4, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3417-:d:810325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.