IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p848-d732467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Coil Current and Oil Film Thickness on Hopf Bifurcation of MLDSB

Author

Listed:
  • Jianhua Zhao

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Hanwen Zhang

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Jianlin Chen

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Xiaochen Wu

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Yongqiang Wang

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Dianrong Gao

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Yingna Liang

    (Fluid Power Transmission and Control Laboratory, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

Abstract

Magnetic-liquid double-suspension bearing (MLDSB) is composed of an electromagnetic supporting system and a hydrostatic supporting system. Due to its greater supporting capacity and stiffness, it is appropriate for middle-speed applications, overloading, and frequent starting. However, because it contains two sets of systems, its structure and rotor support system are more complex. It contains strong nonlinear links. When the parameters of the system change, the bearing rotor may feature Hopf bifurcation, resulting in system flutter and reducing the operational stability of the magnetic fluid double-suspension bearing rotor, which has become one of the key problems restricting its development and application. As key parameters of MLDSB, the coil current and oil film thickness exert a major impact on Hopf bifurcation. Therefore, the mathematical model of MLDSB is established in this paper, and the border and direction of Hopf bifurcation, period, and amplitude of limit cycle are analyzed. The calculation, simulation, and experimental results show that when the coil current and oil film thickness of the bearing system are greater than the boundary value of the Hopf bifurcation, Hopf bifurcation will occur, resulting in the vibration of the bearing rotor and affecting the stability of the system. In addition, when analyzing the combined effects of coil current and oil film thickness on the Hopf bifurcation of the system, it was found that the boundary value of Hopf bifurcation in the system is reduced compared with when it is are affected solely due to the coupling of the two parameters. The period, amplitude and vibration speed of limit cycle increase with increases in the coil current and oil film thickness. Hopf bifurcation experiment was conducted on MLDSB testing system. The results show that Hopf bifurcation does not occur when i 0 < 0.5 A, the bearing rotor operates stably in the balanced position, i 0 > 1.0 A, Hopf bifurcation occurs in the system, and the bearing rotor vibrates with equal amplitude, which reduces the stability of operation. The research in this paper can provide a theoretical reference for the Hopf bifurcation analysis of MLDSB.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianhua Zhao & Hanwen Zhang & Jianlin Chen & Xiaochen Wu & Yongqiang Wang & Dianrong Gao & Yingna Liang, 2022. "Influence of Coil Current and Oil Film Thickness on Hopf Bifurcation of MLDSB," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:848-:d:732467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/848/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/848/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Tan & Liang Zhou & Weibo Zheng & Honglin Song & Zhibin Sun & Zhiyin Wang & Guisheng Wang & Guanjun Wang & Liming Zhang & Xingyu Zhou, 2022. "Using Finite Element Method for Stress-Strain Evaluation of Commonly Used Buried Pipelines in Fault," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:848-:d:732467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.