IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p820-d731860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences of Pore Features in Marine Shales between Lower Cambrian and Lower Silurian Formations of Upper Yangtze Area, South China

Author

Listed:
  • Minghui Li

    (School of Energy Resource, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Mingliang Li

    (Production Operation Department, Qinghe Oil Production Plant of Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Co., Ltd., Weifang 262714, China)

  • Haiping Huang

    (School of Energy Resource, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Lei Gong

    (Bohai-Rim Energy Research Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Debao Zheng

    (Downhole Operations Company, Daqing Oilfield, CNPC, Daqing 163453, China)

Abstract

Lower Cambrian shale and lower Silurian shale are both typical of oil-prone kerogen and siliceous composition, but different in thermal maturities. Porosity differences were determined in marine shales between the two shales. Measurements were utilized including organic geochemistry, XRD, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and N 2 gas adsorption. Pore volume (PV) of lower Silurian shale was approximately 1.5 times higher than that of lower Cambrian shale, and pore surface area (PSA) of lower Silurian shale was almost 2.5 times higher than that of lower Cambrian shale. Lower Cambrian shale and lower Silurian shale possess similar materials, but distinctive thermal degrees. Evolution mechanisms of different types of pores, especially organic matter (OM)-hosted pores, may trigger this different pore features. Pores of rigid framework are the residue of primary interparticle pores during the burial history. Pores associated with clay flakes can be preserved well adjacent to rigid grains or secondary minerals acting as rigid frameworks or grain supporters. Dissolved pores in both lower Cambrian shale and lower Silurian shale barely contribute to the total porosity and mean little to the permeability. Both excessive OM content and over thermal maturity are detrimental to development of OM-hosted pores. Rigid particles, clay flakes, and OM commonly co-exist within shale matrix. Rigid grains act as supporters, clay flakes confine ample space, and OM first migrates into and provides secondary OM-hosted pores. In this condition, pores can be preserved owing to associating matrix with good mechanic and chemical stability. The significant differences of structural settings result into various hydrocarbon explosion efficiency and different pressure circumstance, which consequently leads to the different pore features between the two shales. For lower Cambrian shale, overpressure circumstance diminish if hydrocarbon expels outside of the shale system, and OM-hosted pores destroy through compaction. Sustaining overpressure and abundant residue hydrocarbon (migrated OM) make positive contributions to the pore properties, in terms of numbers, diameters and connectivity of the lower Silurian shale samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Minghui Li & Mingliang Li & Haiping Huang & Lei Gong & Debao Zheng, 2022. "Differences of Pore Features in Marine Shales between Lower Cambrian and Lower Silurian Formations of Upper Yangtze Area, South China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:820-:d:731860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/820/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/820/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:820-:d:731860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.