IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1095-d740533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Drive Cycle-Based Traction Motor Design Strategies Using Gradient Optimisation

Author

Listed:
  • Stavros Pastellides

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

  • Stiaan Gerber

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

  • Rong-Jie Wang

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

  • Maarten Kamper

    (Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa)

Abstract

In this paper, two design optimisation methods are evaluated using gradient-based optimisation for electric vehicle traction applications. A driving cycle-based approach is used to evaluate specific operational points for the design optimisation procedure. To determine the operational points, an energy centre of gravity (ECG) approach is used. Both optimisation methods are described, namely the point based method and the flux mapping method, with a focus on the flux mapping procedure. Within the flux mapping approach, an inner optimisation loop is defined in order to maintain the stability of gradient calculation for the gradient-based optimisation. An emphasis is placed on the importance of how the optimisation problem is defined, in terms of the objective function and constraints, and how it affects a gradient based optimisation. Based on a design case study conducted in the paper, it is found that the point-based strategy realised motor designs with a slightly lower overall cost (5.66% lower than that of the flux mapping strategy with 8 ECG points), whereas the flux mapping strategy found motor designs with a lower input energy (1.48% lower than that of the point-based strategy with 8 ECG points). This may be attributed to the difference in the definition and interpretation of constraints between these two methods. It is also shown that including more operational points from the driving cycle in the design optimisation leads to designs with reduced total input energy and thus better drive-cycle energy efficiency. This paper further illustrates the significant computational advantages of a gradient-based optimisation over a global optimisation method as it can be completed within a fraction of the time while still finding a global optimum, as long as the problem definition is correctly determined.

Suggested Citation

  • Stavros Pastellides & Stiaan Gerber & Rong-Jie Wang & Maarten Kamper, 2022. "Evaluation of Drive Cycle-Based Traction Motor Design Strategies Using Gradient Optimisation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1095-:d:740533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jong-Kyong Lim & Bon-Gwan Gu & Seong-Hwan Im & Rae-Young Kim, 2022. "Design of Stator Winding Turn Number of Tap-Change PMSM for EVs According to Driving Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1095-:d:740533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.