IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1064-d739596.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shape Carving Methods of Geologic Body Interpretation from Seismic Data Based on Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei Petrov

    (Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Tapan Mukerji

    (Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Xin Zhang

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xinfei Yan

    (Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, PetroChina, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

The task of seismic data interpretation is a time-consuming and uncertain process. Machine learning tools can help to build a shortcut between raw seismic data and reservoir characteristics of interest. Recently, techniques involving convolutional neural networks have started to gain momentum. Convolutional neural networks are particularly efficient at pattern recognition within images, and this is why they are suitable for seismic facies classification and interpretation tasks. We experimented with three different architectures based on convolutional layers and compared them with different synthetic and field datasets in terms of quality of the seismic interpretation results and computational efficiency. The architectures used in our study were three deep fully convolutional architectures: a 3D convolutional network with a fully connected head; a 2D fully convolutional network, and U-Net. We found the U-Net architecture to be both robust and the fastest when performing classification at the prediction stage. The 3D convolutional model with a fully connected head was the slowest, while a fully convolutional model was unstable in its predictions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei Petrov & Tapan Mukerji & Xin Zhang & Xinfei Yan, 2022. "Shape Carving Methods of Geologic Body Interpretation from Seismic Data Based on Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1064-:d:739596
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1064-:d:739596. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.