Author
Listed:
- Anton Shchipanov
(Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)
- Lars Kollbotn
(Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)
- Mauro Encinas
(Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway
Department of Energy and Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger (UiS), Kjell Arholms gate 41, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)
- Ingebret Fjelde
(Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)
- Roman Berenblyum
(Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE), Professor Olav Hanssens vei 15, 4021 Stavanger, Norway)
Abstract
Storing CO 2 in geological formations is an important component of reducing greenhouse gases emissions. The Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) industry is now in its establishing phase, and if successful, massive storage volumes would be needed. It will hence be important to utilize each storage site to its maximum, without challenging the formation integrity. For different reasons, supply of CO 2 to the injection sites may be periodical or unstable, often considered as a risk element reducing the overall efficiency and economics of CCS projects. In this paper we present outcomes of investigations focusing on a variety of positive aspects of periodic CO 2 injection, including pressure management and storage capacity, also highlighting reservoir monitoring opportunities. A feasibility study of periodic injection into an infinite saline aquifer using a mechanistic reservoir model has indicated significant improvement in storage capacity compared to continuous injection. The reservoir pressure and CO 2 plume behavior were further studied revealing a ‘CO 2 expansion squeeze’ effect that governs the improved storage capacity observed in the feasibility study. Finally, the improved pressure measurement and storage capacity by periodic injection was confirmed by field-scale simulations based on a real geological set-up. The field-scale simulations have confirmed that ‘CO 2 expansion squeeze’ governs the positive effect, which is also influenced by well location in the geological structure and aquifer size, while CO 2 dissolution in water showed minor influence. Additional reservoir effects and risks not covered in this paper are then highlighted as a scope for further studies. The value of the periodic injection with intermittent CO 2 supply is finally discussed in the context of deployment and integration of this technology in the establishing CCS industry.
Suggested Citation
Anton Shchipanov & Lars Kollbotn & Mauro Encinas & Ingebret Fjelde & Roman Berenblyum, 2022.
"Periodic CO 2 Injection for Improved Storage Capacity and Pressure Management under Intermittent CO 2 Supply,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:566-:d:724070
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:566-:d:724070. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.