IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i24p9511-d1004106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nuclear Data Sensitivity and Uncertainty Study for the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Benchmark Using RMC and SCALE

Author

Listed:
  • Chengjian Jin

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shichang Liu

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Shenghao Zhang

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Jingang Liang

    (Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Yixue Chen

    (School of Nuclear Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

In order to improve the safety and economy of nuclear reactors, it is necessary to analyze the sensitivity and uncertainty (S/U) of the nuclear data. The capabilities of S/U analysis has been developed in the Reactor Monte Carlo code RMC, using the iterated fission probability (IFP) method and the superhistory method. In this paper, the S/U capabilities of RMC are applied to a typical PWR benchmark B&W’s Core XI, and compared with the multigroup and continuous-energy S/U capabilities in the SCALE code system. The S/U results of the RMC-IFP method and the RMC-superhistory method are compared with TSUNAMI-CE/MG in SCALE. The sensitivity results and the uncertainty results of major nuclides that contribute a lot to the uncertainties in k eff are in good agreement in both RMC and SCALE. The RMC-superhistory method has the same precision as the IFP method, but it reduces the memory footprint by more than 95% and only doubles the running time. The superhistory method has obvious advantages when there are many nuclides and reaction types to be analyzed. In addition, the total uncertainties in the k eff of the first-order uncertainty quantification method are compared with the stochastic sampling method, and the maximum relative deviation of total uncertainties in the k eff is 8.53%. Verification shows that the capabilities of S/U analysis developed in the RMC code has good accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengjian Jin & Shichang Liu & Shenghao Zhang & Jingang Liang & Yixue Chen, 2022. "Nuclear Data Sensitivity and Uncertainty Study for the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) Benchmark Using RMC and SCALE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9511-:d:1004106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9511/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/24/9511/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:24:p:9511-:d:1004106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.