IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i23p9094-d989722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests Analysis and Numerical Simulation in Montney Shale Formation

Author

Listed:
  • Lulu Liao

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping District, Beijing 102200, China
    Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Changping District, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Gensheng Li

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Changping District, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Yu Liang

    (Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Changping District, Beijing 102200, China)

  • Yijin Zeng

    (Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Changping District, Beijing 102200, China)

Abstract

Unconventional oil and gas formations are abundant, have become an increasingly important part of the global energy supply, and are attracting increasing attention from the industry. Predicting key reservoir properties plays a significant role in both geological science and subsurface engineering workflows. With the advent of horizontal well drilling and multiple-stage hydraulic fracturing, the Montney Shale formation is one of the most promising and productive shale plays in Canada. However, very few academic papers discuss its in situ stress, reservoir pressure, and permeability, which are essential for the development of the Montney Shale. The objective of this study is to analyze the geo-stress, the pore pressure, and several key reservoir properties by using diagnostic fracture injection test (DFIT) data from the Montney Shale. One horizontal well from the Wapiti field has been analyzed with a set of DFIT data, and its results show that the general pressure and Gdp/dG responses from Well-A indicate a signature of height recession/transverse storage. In the study, the Tangent Line method, the Compliance method, and the Variable Compliance method have been applied to estimate the key reservoir properties. As a result, the Well-A DFIT analysis estimates that the closure pressure is ranging from 34.367 to 39.344 MPa, contributing to the stress gradient from 14.09 to 16.13 KPa/m for the formation. The pore pressure is ranging from 20.82 to 24.58 MPa, contributing to the pore pressure gradient from 8.54 to 10.07 KPa/m for the formation. The porosity is ranging from 3% to 6%. These reservoir properties are contoured cross the Montney Shale formation. Using the DFIT’s numerical simulation and history matching, the reservoir permeability is 0.024 md, fracture length is 13.44 m, and fracture geometries are analyzed by different models. Moreover, the physics behind the DFIT are analyzed and discussed in detail. For the first time, three different analysis methods have been applied to estimate a series of key reservoir properties for the case wells in the Montney Shale formation. This approach can not only reduce the potential prediction error caused by a single method application but also increase the persuasiveness of the assessment and save time, ensuring the efficient implementation of engineering operations. Given the significance of quantifying in situ stress and reservoir pore pressure in unconventional hydrocarbon exploration and development, this study could help the operator to quickly understand the stress regimes, the fracture geometry, and the formation properties of the Montney Shale formation in the Wapiti field. Furthermore, the interpreted results demonstrated in this paper are adding substantial business value to the asset, especially in terms of improving the hydraulic fracturing design and, thus, accelerating the cashflow from production.

Suggested Citation

  • Lulu Liao & Gensheng Li & Yu Liang & Yijin Zeng, 2022. "Diagnostic Fracture Injection Tests Analysis and Numerical Simulation in Montney Shale Formation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9094-:d:989722
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/23/9094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:23:p:9094-:d:989722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.