IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i21p8272-d964125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automated Classification of Pipeline Defects from Ultrasonic Phased Array Total Focusing Method Imaging

Author

Listed:
  • Haibin Wang

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Zhichao Fan

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Xuedong Chen

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Jingwei Cheng

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Wei Chen

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Zhe Wang

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

  • Yangguang Bu

    (National Safety Engineering Technology Research Centre for Pressure Vessels and Pipelines, Hefei General Machinery Research Institute, Hefei 230031, China)

Abstract

The defects in the welds of energy pipelines have significantly influenced their safe operation. The inefficient and inaccurate detection of the defects may give rise to catastrophic accidents. Ultrasonic phased array inspection is an important means of ensuring pipeline safety. The total focusing method (TFM), using ultrasonic phased arrays, has become widely used in recent years in non-destructive evaluation (NDE). However, manual defect recognition of TFM images is seen to lack accuracy and robustness, arising from deficiency of practical experience. In this paper, the automated classification of different defects from TFM images is studied with a view to facilitate inspection efficacy. By experimentally implementing the TFM approach on a bespoke specimen, the images corresponding to crack-like defects and pore-like defects were employed to investigate the effectiveness of four different machine learning models (known as Support Vector Machine, CART Decision tree, K Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes) containing data augmentation, feature extraction and defect classification. The results suggested that the accuracy of defect classification using the HOG-Poly-SVM algorithm was 93%, which outperformed the results from other algorithms. The advantage of the HOG-Poly-SVM algorithm used in defect classification of ultrasonic phased array TFM data is discussed by conducting ten-fold cross validation and other evaluation metrics. In this paper, in order to improve the efficiency of detecting pipeline defects in the future, and for testing test blocks simulating buried pipelines containing defects, we proposed, for the first time, that ultrasonic phased-array TFM imaging results in small object detection images, and found that the SVM algorithm was applicable to ultrasonic phased array TFM imaging, providing a research method and ideas for the use of artificial intelligence in industrial non-destructive testing.

Suggested Citation

  • Haibin Wang & Zhichao Fan & Xuedong Chen & Jingwei Cheng & Wei Chen & Zhe Wang & Yangguang Bu, 2022. "Automated Classification of Pipeline Defects from Ultrasonic Phased Array Total Focusing Method Imaging," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8272-:d:964125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/21/8272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:21:p:8272-:d:964125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.