IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i9p2721-d551404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation Method of Production Pressure Differential in Deep Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study in Tarim Basin, Northwest China

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyang Weng

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Jingen Deng

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Chunfang Zhang

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Qiang Tan

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

  • Zhuo Chen

    (Tianjin Branch of CNOOC (China) Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300459, China)

  • Wei Liu

    (Department of Petroleum Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China)

Abstract

Deep and even ultra-deep petroleum resources play a gradually increasing and important role with the worldwide continuous advancement of oil and gas exploration and development. In China, the deep carbonate reservoirs in the Tarim Basin are regarded as the key development areas due to their huge reserves. However, due to the unreasonable design of production pressure differential, some production wells suffered from severe borehole collapse and tubing blockage. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to optimize a more practical method for predicting the critical production pressure differential. The commonly used analytical methods with different failure criteria for predicting production pressure differential were summarized. Furthermore, their advantages and disadvantages were analyzed. A new numerical model is established based on the finite element theory in order to make the prediction of production pressure differential more accurate. Additionally, both analytical and numerical methods were applied to evaluating the production pressure differential of deep carbonate reservoirs in the Tarim Basin, and the results were discussed compared with field data. In addition, a series of laboratory tests, including porosity and permeability measurements, electron microscope scanning, XRD for mineral analysis, uniaxial and triaxial compressive strength test, etc., were carried out by using the collected carbonate cores from formations deeper than 7000 m to obtain the input parameters of the simulation such as the rock properties. The experimental results showed that the carbonate rocks exhibited a remarkable brittleness and post-peak strain softening. The calculation results revealed that the Mogi-Coulomb criterion is slightly conservative; however, it is more suitable than other criteria to evaluate pressure differential. Furthermore, it has been confirmed by the field data that the finite element numerical method can not only reveal the instability mechanism of the wellbore but also predict the critical production pressure differential accurately. Unfortunately, the on-site operators sometimes require a more convenient way, such as an analytical method, to figure out the pressure differential, even though the evaluation of the numerical method is more accurate. Therefore, the discussion in this paper can provide a basis for the operators to determine the production pressure differential flexibly.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyang Weng & Jingen Deng & Chunfang Zhang & Qiang Tan & Zhuo Chen & Wei Liu, 2021. "Evaluation Method of Production Pressure Differential in Deep Carbonate Reservoirs: A Case Study in Tarim Basin, Northwest China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2721-:d:551404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2721/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2721/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:9:p:2721-:d:551404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.