IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i6p1783-d522817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Testing of Fracture Conductivity Damage by Foam-Based Fracturing Fluids in Low Permeability Tight Gas Formations

Author

Listed:
  • Klaudia Wilk-Zajdel

    (Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Piotr Kasza

    (Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Mateusz Masłowski

    (Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

In the case of fracturing of the reservoirs using fracturing fluids, the size of damage to the proppant conductivity caused by treatment fluids is significant, which greatly influence the effective execution of hydraulic fracturing operations. The fracturing fluid should be characterized by the minimum damage to the conductivity of a fracture filled with proppant. A laboratory research procedure has been developed to study the damage effect caused by foamed and non-foamed fracturing fluids in the fractures filled with proppant material. The paper discusses the results for high quality foamed guar-based linear gels, which is an innovative aspect of the work compared to the non-foamed frac described in most of the studies and simulations. The tests were performed for the fracturing fluid based on a linear polymer (HPG—hydroxypropyl guar, in liquid and powder form). The rheology of nitrogen foamed-based fracturing fluids (FF) with a quality of 70% was investigated. The quartz sand and ceramic light proppant LCP proppant was placed between two Ohio sandstone rock slabs and subjected to a given compressive stress of 4000–6000 psi, at a temperature of 60 °C for 5 h. A significant reduction in damage to the quartz proppant was observed for the foamed fluid compared to that damaged by the 7.5 L/m 3 natural polymer-based non-foamed linear fluid. The damage was 72.3% for the non-foamed fluid and 31.5% for the 70% foamed fluid, which are superior to the guar gum non-foamed fracturing fluid system. For tests based on a polymer concentration of 4.88 g/L, the damage to the fracture conductivity by the non-foamed fluid was 64.8%, and 26.3% for the foamed fluid. These results lead to the conclusion that foamed fluids could damage the fracture filled with proppant much less during hydraulic fracturing treatment. At the same time, when using foamed fluids, the viscosity coefficient increases a few times compared to the use of non-foamed fluids, which is necessary for proppant carrying capacities and properly conducted stimulation treatment. The research results can be beneficial for optimizing the type and performance of fracturing fluid for hydraulic fracturing in tight gas formations.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaudia Wilk-Zajdel & Piotr Kasza & Mateusz Masłowski, 2021. "Laboratory Testing of Fracture Conductivity Damage by Foam-Based Fracturing Fluids in Low Permeability Tight Gas Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1783-:d:522817
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1783/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/6/1783/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klaudia Wilk, 2019. "Experimental and Simulation Studies of Energized Fracturing Fluid Efficiency in Tight Gas Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Przemyslaw Michal Wilczynski & Andrzej Domonik & Pawel Lukaszewski, 2021. "Anisotropy of Strength and Elastic Properties of Lower Paleozoic Shales from the Baltic Basin, Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:6:p:1783-:d:522817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.