IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i21p7439-d674624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Method of Comparative Evaluation of the Drive Units of Two Bucket Elevators—A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Sokolski

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Justyna Sokolska

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Bucket elevators are applied in many industries for bulk material handling. One of the main requirements for these devices is their high operational reliability. This applies in particular to power units that must operate continuously without failure. This article presents a comparative assessment of the drive units of two bucket elevators. The vibration intensity of their bearing units was used as the basis for the comparison. The evaluation was carried out using three independent methods based on the vibration velocity analysis: in the time domain, in the frequency domain and using the probabilistic approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Sokolski & Justyna Sokolska, 2021. "A Method of Comparative Evaluation of the Drive Units of Two Bucket Elevators—A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7439-:d:674624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:21:p:7439-:d:674624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.