IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i23p6395-d455703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Limit State Assessment of a 3-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Tee in a Nuclear Power Plant Using a Damage Index

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Wan Kim

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Da-Woon Yun

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Sung-Jin Chang

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Dong-Uk Park

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

  • Bub-Gyu Jeon

    (Seismic Research and Test Center, Pusan National University, 49 Busandaehak-ro, Yangsan 50612, Korea)

Abstract

Seismic motions are likely to cause large displacements in nuclear power plants because the main mode of their piping systems is dominated by the low-frequency region. Additionally, large relative displacement may occur in the piping systems because their supports are installed in several places, and each support is subjected to different seismic motions. Therefore, to assess the seismic performance of a piping system, the relative displacement repeated by seismic motions must be considered. In this study, in-plane cyclic loading tests were conducted under various constant amplitudes using test specimens composed of SCH 40 3-inch pipes and a tee in the piping system of a nuclear power plant. Additionally, an attempt was made to quantitatively express the failure criteria using a damage index based on the dissipated energy that used the force–displacement and moment–deformation angle relationships. The failure mode was defined as the leakage caused by a through-wall crack, and the failure criteria were compared and analyzed using the damage index of Park and Ang and that of Banon. Additionally, the method of defining the yield point required to calculate the damage index was examined. It was confirmed that the failure criteria of the SCH 40 3-inch carbon steel pipe tee can be effectively expressed using the damage index.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Sung-Jin Chang & Dong-Uk Park & Bub-Gyu Jeon, 2020. "Quantitative Limit State Assessment of a 3-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Tee in a Nuclear Power Plant Using a Damage Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6395-:d:455703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/23/6395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gyeong-Hoi Koo & Jong-Sung Kim & Yun-Jae Kim, 2020. "Feasibility Study on Strain-Based Seismic Design Criteria for Nuclear Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sung-Wan Kim & Da-Woon Yun & Bub-Gyu Jeon & Dae-Gi Hahm & Min-Kyu Kim, 2021. "Evaluation of the Limit State of a Six-Inch Carbon Steel Pipe Elbow in Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gyeong-Hoi Koo & Shinyoung Kwag & Hyun-Suk Nam, 2021. "Study on Inelastic Strain-Based Seismic Fragility Analysis for Nuclear Metal Components," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:23:p:6395-:d:455703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.