IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i12p3049-d370865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unlocking the Effects of Fluid Optimization on Remaining Oil Saturation for the Combined Sulfate-Modified Water and Polymer Flooding

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Tahir

    (Institute of Subsurface Energy Systems, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany)

  • Rafael E. Hincapie

    (Institute of Subsurface Energy Systems, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany)

  • Leonhard Ganzer

    (Institute of Subsurface Energy Systems, Clausthal University of Technology, 38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany)

Abstract

Interfacial interactions and wettability alteration remain as the main recovery mechanism when modified water is applied seeking to obtain higher oil recoveries. Fluid-fluid interaction could lead to the development of the called viscoelastic layer at the interface in oil-brine systems. This interfacial layer stabilizes thanks to the slow chemical interaction between oil polar compounds and salts in the brine. This study investigates the role of sulfate presence in injection brine that could possible lead to develop the interfacial viscoelastic layer and hence to contribute to the higher oil recovery. Furthermore, polymer flooding is performed in tertiary mode after brine flood to investigate/unlock the synergies and potential benefits of the hybrid enhanced oil recovery. Brine optimization is performed using the composition of two formation brines and four injection brines. Moreover, interfacial tension measurements and oil drop snap-off volume measurements are performed in parallel with the core flooding experiments to define the role of interfacial viscoelasticity as the recovery mechanism other than wettability alteration. Synthetic seawater spiked with double amount of sulfate depicted potential results of interfacial viscoelastic layer development and hence to contribute the higher oil recovery. Total oil recovery after secondary-mode using sulfate-modified water and tertiary-mode polymer flood was higher than the combination of seawater brine in secondary-mode and polymer flood in tertiary-mode. Nevertheless, experiments helped us concluding that the amount of sulfate added is a critical factor to obtain maximum oil recovery and to avoid pore-plugging problems. We, therefore, demonstrate that executing a detailed fluid optimization leads to promising laboratory results, potentially linked with an improvement in the economics of the field applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Tahir & Rafael E. Hincapie & Leonhard Ganzer, 2020. "Unlocking the Effects of Fluid Optimization on Remaining Oil Saturation for the Combined Sulfate-Modified Water and Polymer Flooding," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3049-:d:370865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3049/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/12/3049/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Tahir & Rafael E. Hincapie & Leonhard Ganzer, 2020. "Influence of Sulfate Ions on the Combined Application of Modified Water and Polymer Flooding—Rheology and Oil Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, May.
    2. Kholood Al-Nofli & Peyman Pourafshary & Nader Mosavat & Ali Shafiei, 2018. "Effect of Initial Wettability on Performance of Smart Water Flooding in Carbonate Reservoirs—An Experimental Investigation with IOR Implications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiazhong Wu & Fanghui Liu & Siyu Yang & Haishui Han & Xinglong Chen & Hui Yang, 2022. "Improved Oil Recovery from Carbonate Reservoirs by Tuning Injection Seawater Composition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-11, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:12:p:3049-:d:370865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.