IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p2970-d179678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment, Mitigation, and Control of Potential Gas Leakage in Existing Buildings Not Designed for Gas Installation in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Heri Hermansyah

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Mohamad Evi Nur Hidayat

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Anggraini Ratih Kumaraningrum

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Masafumi Yohda

    (Institute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 2-24-16 Naka-cho, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8588, Japan)

  • Azmi B. Mohd Shariff

    (Institute of Contaminant Management for Oil & Gas Research & Innovation, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Perak Darul Ridzuan 32610, Malaysia)

Abstract

Operational activities of gas pipelines are associated with potential hazards and risks that can potentially lead to pipeline failure, including failure of the gas distribution pipeline in existing buildings. Unfortunately, few studies on risk analysis of the gas distribution pipeline in existing buildings have been published. Therefore, this study was conducted to provide a reference for analyzing the risk of pipeline leakage caused by small-scale leakage, large-scale gas release, and gas pipeline rupture in existing buildings in Indonesia not designed for gas installation. The study was performed using the event tree analysis method. The methodology of this study was initiated by identifying the scenario of the case of small-scale leakage, large-scale gas release, or gas pipeline rupture. Then, pivotal events were identified, an event tree diagram was constructed, the event failure of each pivotal event was determined, and the probability value of the outcome risk was calculated. The risk was evaluated in terms of fire, casualties, and gas released. The results of this study showed the highest risk in each scenario which can result in fire, severe casualties, and light poisoning. The highest risk in the small-scale leak scenario had a probability value of 1.5 × 10 −3 . In the large-scale gas release scenario, the highest risk had a probability value to incur a fireball, severe casualties, and light gas poisoning of 6.0 × 10 −4 . In the gas pipeline rupture scenario, the highest risk had a probability value of fireball, severe casualties, and light poisoning of 7.0 × 10 −4 . The probability value of each risk was reduced by the installation of a gas detector and water sprinkler as a barrier.

Suggested Citation

  • Heri Hermansyah & Mohamad Evi Nur Hidayat & Anggraini Ratih Kumaraningrum & Masafumi Yohda & Azmi B. Mohd Shariff, 2018. "Assessment, Mitigation, and Control of Potential Gas Leakage in Existing Buildings Not Designed for Gas Installation in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2970-:d:179678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2970/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2970/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wan Zhang & Ruihao Shen & Ning Xu & Haoran Zhang & Yongtu Liang, 2020. "Study on Optimization of Active Control Schemes for Considering Transient Processes in the Case of Pipeline Leakage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Heri Hermansyah & Anggraini Ratih Kumaraningrum & Julwan Hendry Purba & Edison & Masafumi Yohda, 2020. "Safety Analysis Technique for System with Limited Data: Case Study of the Multipurpose Research Reactor in Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2970-:d:179678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.