IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i6p176-d1680603.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetry in Distributions of Accumulated Gains and Losses in Stock Returns

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Farahani

    (Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0011, USA)

  • Rostislav A. Serota

    (Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0011, USA)

Abstract

We studied decades-long (1980 to 2024) historic distributions of accumulated S&P500 returns, from daily returns to those over several weeks. The time series of the returns emphasize major upheavals in the markets—Black Monday, Tech Bubble, Financial Crisis, and the COVID pandemic—which are reflected in the tail ends of the distributions. De-trending the overall gain, we concentrated on comparing distributions of gains and losses. Specifically, we compared the tails of the distributions, which are believed to exhibit a power-law behavior and possibly contain outliers. To this end, we determined confidence intervals of the linear fits of the tails of the complementary cumulative distribution functions on a log–log scale and conducted a statistical U-test in order to detect outliers. We also studied probability density functions of the full distributions of the returns with an emphasis on their asymmetry. The key empirical observations are that the mean of de-trended distributions increases near-linearly with the number of days of accumulation while the overall skew is negative—consistent with the heavier tails of losses—and depends little on the number of days of accumulation. At the same time, the variance of the distributions exhibits near-perfect linear dependence on the number of days of accumulation; that is, it remains constant if scaled to the latter. Finally, we discuss the theoretical framework for understanding accumulated returns. Our main conclusion is that the current state of theory, which predicts symmetric or near-symmetric distributions of returns, cannot explain the aggregate of empirical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Farahani & Rostislav A. Serota, 2025. "Asymmetry in Distributions of Accumulated Gains and Losses in Stock Returns," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:176-:d:1680603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/6/176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/6/176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcin Wk{a}torek & Jaros{l}aw Kwapie'n & Stanis{l}aw Dro.zd.z, 2021. "Financial Return Distributions: Past, Present, and COVID-19," Papers 2107.06659, arXiv.org.
    2. Josep Perello & Jaume Masoliver, 2002. "Stochastic volatility and leverage effect," Papers cond-mat/0202203, arXiv.org.
    3. Rui Albuquerque, 2012. "Skewness in Stock Returns: Reconciling the Evidence on Firm Versus Aggregate Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(5), pages 1630-1673.
    4. Duffee, Gregory R., 1995. "Stock returns and volatility A firm-level analysis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 399-420, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jondeau, Eric & Zhang, Qunzi & Zhu, Xiaoneng, 2019. "Average skewness matters," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 29-47.
    2. Bae, Kwangil & Kang, Jangkoo & Lee, Soonhee, 2016. "Bullish/bearish/neutral strategies under short sale restrictions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 227-239.
    3. Aabo, Tom & Pantzalis, Christos & Park, Jung Chul, 2016. "Multinationality as real option facilitator — Illusion or reality?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-17.
    4. Mathias S. Kruttli & Brigitte Roth Tran & Sumudu W. Watugala, 2025. "Pricing Poseidon: Extreme Weather Uncertainty and Firm Return Dynamics," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 80(2), pages 783-832, April.
    5. Liew, Ping-Xin & Lim, Kian-Ping & Goh, Kim-Leng, 2020. "Does proprietary day trading provide liquidity at a cost to investors?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Christos Floros & Konstantinos Gkillas & Christoforos Konstantatos & Athanasios Tsagkanos, 2020. "Realized Measures to Explain Volatility Changes over Time," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    7. Agbeyegbe, Terence D., 2015. "An inverted U-shaped crude oil price return-implied volatility relationship," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 28-45.
    8. Ercan Balaban & Asli Bayar & Ozgur Berk Kan, 2001. "Stock returns, seasonality and asymmetric conditional volatility in world equity markets," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(4), pages 263-268.
    9. Koutmos, Gregory, 1998. "Asymmetries in the Conditional Mean and the Conditional Variance: Evidence From Nine Stock Markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 277-290, May.
    10. Chang, Bo Young & Christoffersen, Peter & Jacobs, Kris, 2013. "Market skewness risk and the cross section of stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 46-68.
    11. Robert Brooks & Robert Faff & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Eliza Wu, 2015. "Do Sovereign Re-Ratings Destabilize Equity Markets during Financial Crises? New Evidence from Higher Return Moments," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5-6), pages 777-799, June.
    12. Ericsson, Jan & Huang, Xiao & Mazzotta, Stefano, 2016. "Leverage and asymmetric volatility: The firm-level evidence," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 1-21.
    13. Kian-Guan Lim & Michelle Lim, 2020. "Financial performance of shipping firms that increase LNG carriers and the support of eco-innovation," Journal of Shipping and Trade, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Thomakos, Dimitrios D. & Wang, Tao, 2003. "Realized volatility in the futures markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 321-353, May.
    15. Chen, I-Ju & Wang, David K., 2019. "Real option, idiosyncratic risk, and corporate investment: Evidence from Taiwan family firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    16. Tarek Eldomiaty & Islam Azzam & Mostafa Fouad & Yasmeen Said, 2024. "The Use of Economic Indicators as Early Signals of Stock Market Progress: Perspectives from Market Potential Index," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Annaert, Jan & De Ceuster, Marc & Van Cappellen, Jef, 2023. "Can average skewness really predict financial returns? The euro area case," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Bibinger, Markus & Neely, Christopher & Winkelmann, Lars, 2019. "Estimation of the discontinuous leverage effect: Evidence from the NASDAQ order book," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 158-184.
    19. Wu, Qi & Yan, Xing, 2019. "Capturing deep tail risk via sequential learning of quantile dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Stephen G Dimmock & Roy Kouwenberg & Olivia S Mitchell & Kim Peijnenburg, 2021. "Household Portfolio Underdiversification and Probability Weighting: Evidence from the Field," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(9), pages 4524-4563.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:6:p:176-:d:1680603. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.