IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v7y2019i1p11-d213502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not p -Values, Said a Little Bit Differently

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Startz

    (Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA)

Abstract

As a contribution toward the ongoing discussion about the use and mis-use of p -values, numerical examples are presented demonstrating that a p -value can, as a practical matter, give you a really different answer than the one that you want.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Startz, 2019. "Not p -Values, Said a Little Bit Differently," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-5, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:11-:d:213502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/1/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/7/1/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Startz, Richard, 2014. "Choosing the More Likely Hypothesis," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 7(2), pages 119-189, November.
    2. Kim, Jae H. & Ji, Philip Inyeob, 2015. "Significance testing in empirical finance: A critical review and assessment," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Jae & Choi, In, 2015. "Unit Roots in Economic and Financial Time Series: A Re-Evaluation based on Enlightened Judgement," MPRA Paper 68411, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jae H. Kim & In Choi, 2017. "Unit Roots in Economic and Financial Time Series: A Re-Evaluation at the Decision-Based Significance Levels," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Jae H. Kim & Kamran Ahmed & Philip Inyeob Ji, 2018. "Significance Testing in Accounting Research: A Critical Evaluation Based on Evidence," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 54(4), pages 524-546, December.
    4. Jae H. Kim & Andrew P. Robinson, 2019. "Interval-Based Hypothesis Testing and Its Applications to Economics and Finance," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, May.
    5. Jae H. Kim & In Choi, 2021. "Choosing the Level of Significance: A Decision‐theoretic Approach," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(1), pages 27-71, March.
    6. Jeremy Arkes, 2020. "Teaching Graduate (and Undergraduate) Econometrics: Some Sensible Shifts to Improve Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Usefulness," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-23, September.
    7. Kellner, Ralf & Rösch, Daniel, 2021. "A Bayesian Re-Interpretation of “significant” empirical financial research," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    8. Jae H. Kim, 2022. "Moving to a world beyond p-value," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2467-2493, November.
    9. Michaelides, Michael, 2021. "Large sample size bias in empirical finance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    10. Todd Mitton, 2022. "Methodological Variation in Empirical Corporate Finance," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 527-575.
    11. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné & Jae H. Kim, 2022. "Stock return predictability: Evaluation based on interval forecasts," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 363-385, April.
    12. Kim, Jae H., 2017. "Stock returns and investors' mood: Good day sunshine or spurious correlation?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 94-103.
    13. Stephan B. Bruns & David I. Stern, 2019. "Lag length selection and p-hacking in Granger causality testing: prevalence and performance of meta-regression models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 797-830, March.
    14. Zack Jourdan & J. Ken. Corley & Randall Valentine & Arthur M. Tran, 2023. "Fintech: A content analysis of the finance and information systems literature," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Geyer-Klingeberg, Jerome & Hang, Markus & Rathgeber, Andreas, 2020. "Meta-analysis in finance research: Opportunities, challenges, and contemporary applications," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    16. Amir Karami & Morgan Lundy & Frank Webb & Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy & Brooke W. McKeever & Robert McKeever, 2021. "Identifying and Analyzing Health-Related Themes in Disinformation Shared by Conservative and Liberal Russian Trolls on Twitter," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Yergeau, Gabriel, 2016. "Profitability and Market Quality of High Frequency Market-makers: An Empirical Investigation," Working Papers 16-3, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    18. Jerome Geyer-Klingeberg & Markus Hang & Andreas Rathgeber, 2021. "Corporate financial hedging and firm value: a meta-analysis," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 461-485, April.
    19. Stutzer, Michael, 2018. "Honest Hypothesis Testing," OSF Preprints 6bnmg, Center for Open Science.
    20. Stef, Nicolae & Ashta, Arvind, 2023. "Dynamics in environmental legislation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    p -value; Bayesian;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:11-:d:213502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.