IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v4y2024i2p21-331d1380760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Disabilities: Validity and Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Cameron M. Gee

    (International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
    Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada)

  • Ava Neely

    (School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Aleksandra Jevdjevic

    (School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Kenedy Olsen

    (School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

  • Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

    (International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
    School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
    Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 2G9, Canada
    Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada)

Abstract

There is an urgent need for valid and reliable measures of physical activity (PA) participation for use among people with physical and/or sensory disabilities. This study involved adapting the Leisure Time PA Questionnaire for People with Spinal Cord Injury for use in individuals with disabilities (i.e., the LTPAQ-D) and performing a preliminary evaluation of its content validity, construct validity, and same-day test–retest reliability in people with disabilities. User interviews assessed the content validity ( n = 5). A cross-sectional study assessed the construct validity and same-day test–retest reliability ( n = 27, 45 ± 21 years). Participants completed the LTPAQ-D, other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA, as well as tests of cardiorespiratory fitness (i.e., peak oxygen consumption ( V ˙ O 2peak )) and muscular strength. LTPAQ-D measures of min/week of aerobic LTPA, aerobic moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA), and strength training shared medium-to-large correlations with other self-report measures of aerobic and strength training PA ( r = 0.458–0.942, ps < 0.01). After controlling for age, aerobic LTPA and MVPA shared moderate partial correlations with V ˙ O 2peak ( r = 0.341 and 0.356, respectively). Min/week of strength training, measured by the LTPAQ-D, was associated with predicted maximal strength on the chest press ( r = 0.621, p = 0.009). All LTPAQ-D measures demonstrated good-to-excellent test–retest reliability (intraclass correlations = 0.709–0.948, ps < 0.01). This study provides preliminary evidence of the validity and reliability of the LTPAQ-D as a measure of LTPA among people with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cameron M. Gee & Ava Neely & Aleksandra Jevdjevic & Kenedy Olsen & Kathleen A. Martin Ginis, 2024. "The Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Disabilities: Validity and Reliability," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:21-331:d:1380760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/4/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/4/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:21-331:d:1380760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.