IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v6y2021i9p96-d630066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons Learnt from Engineering Science Projects Participating in the Horizon 2020 Open Research Data Pilot

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Austin

    (Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission, 1755 LE Petten, The Netherlands
    These authors contributed equally to this work.
    The views expressed are purely those of the author and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission.)

  • Kyriaki Bei

    (Data Science Group, Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions (IRES), Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Theodoros Efthymiadis

    (Data Science Group, Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions (IRES), Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Elias P. Koumoulos

    (Data Science Group, Innovation in Research & Engineering Solutions (IRES), Rue Koningin Astridlaan 59B, 1780 Wemmel, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Trends in the sciences are indicative of data management becoming established as a feature of the mainstream research process. In this context, the European Commission introduced an Open Research Data pilot at the start of the Horizon 2020 research programme. This initiative followed the success of the Open Access pilot implemented in the prior (FP7) research programme, which thereafter became an integral component of Horizon 2020. While the Open Access phenomenon can reasonably be argued to be one of many instances of web technologies disrupting established business models (namely publication practices and workflows established over several centuries in the case of Open Access), initiatives designed to promote research data management have no established foundation on which to build. For Open Data to become a reality and, more importantly, to contribute to the scientific process, data management best practices and workflows are required. Furthermore, with the scientific community having operated to good effect in the absence of data management, there is a need to demonstrate the merits of data management. This circumstance is complicated by the lack of the necessary ICT infrastructures, especially interoperability standards, required to facilitate the seamless transfer, aggregation and analysis of research data. Any activity aiming to promote Open Data thus needs to overcome a number of cultural and technological challenges. It is in this context that this paper examines the data management activities and outcomes of a number of projects participating in the Horizon 2020 Open Research Data pilot. The result has been to identify a number of commonly encountered benefits and issues; to assess the utilisation of data management plans; and through the close examination of specific cases, to gain insights into obstacles to data management and potential solutions. Although primarily anecdotal and difficult to quantify, the experiences reported in this paper tend to favour developing data management best practices rather than doggedly pursue the Open Data mantra. While Open Data may prove valuable in certain circumstances, there is good reason to claim that managed access to scientific data of high inherent intellectual and financial value will prove more effective in driving knowledge discovery and innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Austin & Kyriaki Bei & Theodoros Efthymiadis & Elias P. Koumoulos, 2021. "Lessons Learnt from Engineering Science Projects Participating in the Horizon 2020 Open Research Data Pilot," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:6:y:2021:i:9:p:96-:d:630066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/6/9/96/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/6/9/96/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:6:y:2021:i:9:p:96-:d:630066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.