Author
Listed:
- Nirajan Bam
(Department of Applied Computing and Engineering Technology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH 45011, USA)
- Laxmi Prasad Sapkota
(Department of Statistics, Tribhuvan University, Tribhuvan Multiple Campus, Palpa 32500, Nepal)
- Pankaj Kumar
(Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur 273009, UP, India)
- Vijay Kumar
(Department of Mathematics and Statistics, DDU Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur 273009, UP, India)
Abstract
This study aims to compare the performance of trigonometric families of distributions, sine-G, cosine-G, and tangent-G, using the inverse Weibull distribution as a baseline, and to guide model selection for six different data structures. Six real datasets with varying distributional characteristics, including right-skewed, left-skewed, and symmetric patterns, were used for comparison and analysis. Model performance was evaluated using both classical and Bayesian model comparison approaches. Across all six datasets, the sine-G family consistently outperformed the cosine-G and tangent-G families using inverse Weibull as a base distribution. The trigonometric families showed strong suitability for right-skewed data but demonstrated limited effectiveness for left-skewed and symmetric datasets. For the Sin-IW model, strong goodness-of-fit performance was observed across datasets with different skewness patterns. For right-skewed datasets (Datasets 1 and 3), the model produced AIC values of 437.4989 and 118.6208 with corresponding KS p -values of 0.9359 and 0.8771. For the symmetric dataset (Dataset 2), the AIC and KS p -value were 118.0071 and 0.6631, respectively. For moderately left-skewed (Dataset 4) and left-skewed data (Dataset 6), the AIC values were 128.1826 and 112.0453 with KS p -values of 0.3138 and 0.0774. For the extremely right-skewed dataset (Dataset 5), the model achieved an AIC of 68.5246 and a KS p -value of 0.9960. Bayesian model comparison further supported the superiority of the Sin-IW model. For Dataset 1, the WAIC values were 474.40 (Sin-IW), 474.60 (Cos-IW), and 493.50 (Tan-IW), while for Dataset 6, the WAIC values were 200.60 (Sin-IW), 207.90 (Cos-IW), and 209.70 (Tan-IW), confirming that Sin-IW demonstrated a good fit for classical and Bayesian inference. These results highlight the robustness of the Sin-G family among trigonometric distributions and offer practical insights for selecting appropriate models when analyzing data with diverse distributional features.
Suggested Citation
Nirajan Bam & Laxmi Prasad Sapkota & Pankaj Kumar & Vijay Kumar, 2026.
"Comparison of Trigonometric Distribution Families Under Classical and Bayesian Approaches,"
Data, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:182-:d:1997545
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:182-:d:1997545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.