IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v11y2026i7p180-d1995716.html

From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery

Author

Listed:
  • Anibal Alviz-Meza

    (Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad Continental, Lima 15302, Peru)

  • Alejandro Valencia-Arias

    (Vicerrectoria de Investigacion y Posgrado, Universidad de Los Lagos, Osorno 5311157, Chile)

  • Segundo Rojas-Flores

    (Institutos y Centros de Investigacion de la Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo 13001, Peru)

  • Felix Diaz

    (Facultad de Ingenieria y Arquitectura, Escuela Profesional de Ingenieria de Sistemas, Universidad Autonoma del Peru, Lima 15842, Peru)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) agents and large language model (LLM) agents are beginning to move materials discovery beyond isolated prediction tasks and toward tool-grounded workflows that can retrieve prior knowledge, configure simulations, launch calculations, inspect outputs, and decide what to do next. However, adjacent reviews on materials informatics, self-driving laboratories, natural-language processing in materials science, and autonomous chemistry have not isolated simulation-driven materials workflows as a distinct evidence base. This review addresses that gap through PRISMA-guided searches in Scopus (8 May 2026) and Web of Science (15 June 2026) for English-language journal articles published between 2022 and 2026. The combined search returned 232 records; 27 full texts were assessed and 26 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis after one full-text exclusion. No eligible study was published in 2022 or 2023, indicating that the field emerged only in 2024 and expanded rapidly in 2025–2026. Catalysis and adsorption tasks ( n = 6) and alloy design or evaluation ( n = 5) dominated the corpus, while specialized multi-agent architectures were the most common pattern ( n = 13). Across the included studies, agentic reasoning was most often coupled to workflow orchestration or integration tools, molecular-dynamics or atomistic simulation environments, and materials-data or machine learning screening pipelines; public repositories or archival artifacts were reported in 18 of 26 studies, experimental validation in six, and robotic closed-loop execution in only one study. The strongest evidence came from workflows that grounded language model decisions in simulators, structured databases, or experimentally verifiable outputs rather than in free-form text alone. This review therefore establishes AI agent workflow orchestration as a distinct analytical category within materials discovery and identifies the reporting, validation, and reproducibility conditions required for these systems to function as credible scientific infrastructure rather than as conversational demonstrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Anibal Alviz-Meza & Alejandro Valencia-Arias & Segundo Rojas-Flores & Felix Diaz, 2026. "From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery," Data, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:180-:d:1995716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/11/7/180/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/11/7/180/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:180-:d:1995716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.