IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v11y2026i7p173-d1988861.html

A Differential Approach to the Generation and Quality Assessment of Synthetic Data for Environmental Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Artem Liubas

    (N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 163020 Arkhangelsk, Russia)

  • Ryskhan Satybaldiyeva

    (Department of Cybersecurity, Information Processing and Storage, Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Galina Bovykina

    (N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 163020 Arkhangelsk, Russia)

  • Alexander Kondakov

    (N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 163020 Arkhangelsk, Russia)

Abstract

High-quality synthetic datasets are critical for environmental monitoring due to the high cost of primary geochemical data collection. However, selection criteria for generative frameworks under small-sample constraints remain poorly defined. This study evaluates two architectures—the deep-learning-based Tabular Variational Autoencoder (TVAE) and the parametric Gaussian copula—using an empirical geochemical dataset (N = 297) of 25 log-transformed elements. Synthesis quality was benchmarked via marginal distribution fidelity (KSComplement), correlation preservation (CorrelationSimilarity), privacy (LogisticDetection), and a composite QualityScore, supplemented by divergence metrics and a rare-earth element (REE+Th+U) subgroup analysis. In this dataset, the Gaussian copula demonstrated superior global correlation preservation (CorrelationSimilarity: 0.9633 vs. 0.9482), particularly for weak-to-moderate dependencies. Conversely, TVAE better replicated marginal distributions (KSComplement: 0.8742 vs. 0.8596), maintained localized correlations (MAD: 0.0728 vs. 0.1196), and showed enhanced privacy (LogisticDetection: 0.5757 vs. 0.3063). These complementary profiles suggest that, for this case study, the Gaussian copula may be preferable for dependency modeling, while TVAE appears better suited for secure open-data dissemination. Further validation on additional datasets is needed to assess the generalizability of these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Artem Liubas & Ryskhan Satybaldiyeva & Galina Bovykina & Alexander Kondakov, 2026. "A Differential Approach to the Generation and Quality Assessment of Synthetic Data for Environmental Monitoring," Data, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:173-:d:1988861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/11/7/173/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/11/7/173/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:7:p:173-:d:1988861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.