Author
Listed:
- Arailym Tleubayeva
(School of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
School of Computer Engineering, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
- Svitlana Biloshchytska
(School of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
Department of Information Technology, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, 03037 Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Oleksandr Kuchanskyi
(School of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
Department of Biomedical Cybernetics, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, 03056 Kyiv, Ukraine
Applied AI Center, Qazaq AI Research University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
- Yurii Andrashko
(Department of System Analysis and Optimization Theory, Uzhhorod National University, 88000 Uzhhorod, Ukraine)
- Pinar Sarisaray Boluk
(Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer and Information Technologies, Istanbul University, Istanbul 34000, Turkey)
- Rostyslav Lisnevskyi
(School of Cybersecurity, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
- Aidos Mukhatayev
(School of General Education Disciplines, Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)
Abstract
Reliable evaluation resources for semantic deduplication, semantic textual similarity (STS), and retrieval remain limited for low-resource and morphologically rich languages. This study introduces KazakhTextDuplicates, a Kazakh-language benchmark for controlled evaluation of semantic duplication under varying levels of semantic preservation and surface-form distortion. The benchmark includes two complementary versions. KazakhTextDuplicates v1.0 is a diagnostic dataset derived from naturally occurring duplicate and near-duplicate pairs for analyzing relationships between duplication labels and lexical overlap. KazakhTextDuplicates v2.0 is a controlled benchmark created using deterministic transformations that define seven semantic duplication regimes: exact duplication, contextual reformulation, paraphrasing, partial semantic overlap, and three levels of character-level noise. Each pair is assigned both a regime label and a predefined similarity score, enabling evaluation across duplicate classification, STS, and retrieval tasks. Five embedding models (BGE-M3, LaBSE, Multilingual-E5-Large, KazEmbed-v5, and OpenAI text-embedding-3-large) were evaluated in a zero-shot setting. Results show that v1.0 is strongly affected by surface-form similarity and is therefore more suitable for diagnostic analysis. In contrast, v2.0 provides a more challenging and informative evaluation environment. OpenAI text-embedding-3-large achieved the strongest STS performance (Pearson = 0.510, Spearman = 0.652, MSE = 0.075) and the best duplicate regime classification results (Accuracy = 0.155, Macro-F1 = 0.066). Retrieval performance remained strong at higher cutoffs despite lower first-rank stability. The results demonstrate that benchmark design substantially affects semantic similarity evaluation and emphasize the need for controlled assessment in low-resource agglutinative languages.
Suggested Citation
Arailym Tleubayeva & Svitlana Biloshchytska & Oleksandr Kuchanskyi & Yurii Andrashko & Pinar Sarisaray Boluk & Rostyslav Lisnevskyi & Aidos Mukhatayev, 2026.
"KazakhTextDuplicates: A Controlled Multi-Regime Benchmark for Semantic Deduplication, Semantic Similarity, and Retrieval in Kazakh,"
Data, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-47, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:6:p:133-:d:1958703
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:6:p:133-:d:1958703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.