A Curated Experimental Dataset of UCS and CBR Results from Biopolymer-Based Two-Additive Stabilisation Studies on Fine-Grained Soils

Published laboratory data on soil stabilisation are abundant, yet they remain fragmented across studies and are often difficult to reuse because of inconsistent reporting formats, heterogeneous testing conditions, and incomplete metadata. This article presents a curated experimental dataset compiled from 20 published studies on fine-grained soils, comprising 560 records, including 397 unconfined compressive strength (UCS) results and 163 California Bearing Ratio (CBR) results. The dataset is defined by the inclusion of laboratory studies designed around biopolymer-based two-additive stabilisation frameworks, while intentionally retaining untreated and single-additive comparator records reported within the same experimental programmes. This design is a key distinguishing feature of the dataset because it enables analysis of baseline soil behaviour, isolated additive effects, and combined-additive responses within a traceable study context. Across the included studies, the treatment systems cover a wide range of biopolymer- and lignin-related materials, including xanthan gum, guar gum, chitosan, sodium lignosulfonate, and electrolyte lignin stabiliser, together with complementary additives such as cement, lime, fly ash, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, rice husk ash, glass powder, concrete waste, nano-additives, and natural or synthetic fibres. In addition to UCS and CBR outcomes, the dataset preserves key contextual variables required for meaningful secondary reuse, including soil classification, grain-size fractions, Atterberg limits, compaction properties, curing duration, additive identities and dosages, and source-level traceability. The data are distributed as a structured Excel workbook comprising two cleaned outcome-specific sheets (CBR_clean and UCS_clean) and four supporting documentation sheets (StudyInventory, DataDictionary, VocabularyMap, and QC_Log). Record-level identifiers, DOI-linked source fields, inferred-curing flags, and qualified outcome descriptors are retained to support auditability, selective filtering, and reproducible reuse. The resulting dataset provides a practical foundation for comparative assessment of stabilisation strategies, pavement and subgrade engineering studies, meta-analysis, and machine learning applications in geotechnical engineering.