Author
Listed:
- Jianfang Gao
(School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
- Chunlin Li
(School of Public Administration, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
- Tifeng Jiao
(State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)
Abstract
University data governance is an essential requirement for the informatization of universities and holds significant importance in advancing the modernization of university governance systems and governance capabilities. This study focuses on the data governance policies released by “Double First-Class” universities in China since 2015. Based on policy text mining and the PMC index model, the paper developed an evaluation system for university data governance policies consisting of 9 primary indicators and 43 secondary indicators and conducted quantitative assessment. The results indicate that the policies are of good quality overall, with 25% rated as excellent, 66.1% as good, and 8.9% as moderate. Many universities have made significant progress in formulating data governance policies. However, there is still considerable room for improvement. For example, while the policy objectives are clearly defined, certain aspects require further refinement; the stakeholder involvement is relatively narrow, lacking diversity; and the mix of policy instruments is imbalanced. To address these issues, it is recommended that policies be optimized by balancing regulatory priorities, establishing a multi-stakeholder collaborative governance framework, and rationalizing the policy instruments mix.
Suggested Citation
Jianfang Gao & Chunlin Li & Tifeng Jiao, 2026.
"Quantitative Evaluation of the Data Governance Policies of “Double First-Class” Universities in China—Based on the PMC Index Model,"
Data, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:4:p:89-:d:1924072
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:4:p:89-:d:1924072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.