Author
Listed:
- Delson Chikobvu
(Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
- Tendai Makoni
(Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
- Frans Frederik Koning
(Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa)
Abstract
The life insurance sector plays a critical role in financial system stability but is inherently exposed to extreme market fluctuations due to long-term liabilities and asset–liability mismatches. This study investigates extreme losses in the growth rates of the JSE Life Insurance Price Index (LIPI) using the Generalised Extreme Value Distribution (GEVD) and the Generalised Pareto Distribution (GPD) under the Extreme Value Theory (EVT) framework. Monthly data from January 2000 to October 2023 were transformed into a loss series, and extreme events were captured using quarterly block maxima and a POT threshold at the 95th percentile. Model parameters were estimated through Maximum Likelihood Estimation, and downside risk was assessed using return levels, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and Tail Value-at-Risk (tVaR). The GEVD model produced a negative shape parameter, consistent with a bounded Weibull-type tail, while the GPD indicated a heavy-tailed distribution. Return level estimates show escalating loss magnitudes and widening uncertainty over longer horizons, reflecting the challenges of projecting rare events. Kupiec backtesting confirms the adequacy and reliability of the GEVD-based VaR across all confidence levels, whereas the GPD underestimates risk at lower thresholds. These findings indicate significant tail risk within the South African life insurance equity segment and underscore the importance of EVT-based risk measures for capital planning and regulatory oversight. The study contributes to financial risk modelling in the life insurance sector and offers practical insights for strengthening solvency assessment and enterprise risk management frameworks.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:4:p:86-:d:1921175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.