Author
Listed:
- Ayoub Hanif
(Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Research and Innovation (LPRI), Moroccan School of Engineering Sciences (EMSI), Casablanca 20250, Morocco
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security Laboratory (2IACS), ENSET, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28830, Morocco)
- Meryem Abid
(Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Research and Innovation (LPRI), Moroccan School of Engineering Sciences (EMSI), Casablanca 20250, Morocco)
- Mohamed Tabaa
(Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Research and Innovation (LPRI), Moroccan School of Engineering Sciences (EMSI), Casablanca 20250, Morocco)
- Hassna Bensag
(Multidisciplinary Laboratory of Research and Innovation (LPRI), Moroccan School of Engineering Sciences (EMSI), Casablanca 20250, Morocco
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security Laboratory (2IACS), ENSET, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28830, Morocco)
- Mohamed Youssfi
(Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security Laboratory (2IACS), ENSET, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28830, Morocco)
Abstract
This paper describes the benchmark dataset for the electric vehicle routing problem with time windows. It is designed to facilitate the large-scale and reproducible evaluation of routing approaches under diverse charging scenarios. It is an extension of the Homberger 1000-customer vehicle-routing benchmark dataset through the incorporation of computationally derived charging-station data. For the 60 base instances included in the dataset, charging-station locations are randomly generated within the customer-coordinate bounds, and two variants are provided, resulting in 120 benchmark problems used in the validation and baseline analyses. A normalized local customer-density score is derived for each station. It is used to determine charging rates and log-normal parameters for prices and waiting times. Two variants are included in the dataset. Variant A maintains the original customer time-window constraints, while Variant B relaxes customer due dates based on the distance from the depot, subject to the depot closing time. The dataset is complemented by instance files, station attributes, parameters, and scripts. It also includes the results of feasibility tests, baseline solver tests, difficulty analyses, and sensitivity tests. These results show that the benchmark includes both easier and harder instance classes under different charging settings. Overall, the dataset is intended to support its use as a reproducible benchmark.
Suggested Citation
Ayoub Hanif & Meryem Abid & Mohamed Tabaa & Hassna Bensag & Mohamed Youssfi, 2026.
"Electric Vehicle Routing with Time Windows and Heterogeneous Charging-Station Attribute Dataset,"
Data, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:4:p:83-:d:1918639
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:11:y:2026:i:4:p:83-:d:1918639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.