IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v10y2025i7p92-d1683477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking and Lessons Learned from Using SharePoint as an Electronic Lab Notebook in Engineering Joint Research Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Feldhoff

    (Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany)

  • Tim Opatz

    (Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany)

  • Hajo Wiemer

    (Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany)

  • Martin Zinner

    (Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany)

  • Steffen Ihlenfeldt

    (Institute of Mechatronic Engineering (IMD), Faculty of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology (IWU), 01187 Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

The adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELNs) significantly enhances research operations by enabling the streamlined capture, storage, and dissemination of data. This promotes collaboration and ensures organised and efficient access to critical research information. Microsoft SharePoint ® (SP) is an established, widely used, web-based platform with advanced collaboration capabilities. This study investigates whether SP can meet the needs of engineering research projects, particularly in a collaborative environment. The paper outlines the process of adapting SP into an ELN tool and evaluates its effectiveness compared to established ELN systems. The evaluation considers several categories related to data management, ranging from data collection to publication. Six distinct application scenarios are analysed, representing a spectrum of collaborative research projects, ranging from small-scale initiatives with minimal processes and data to large-scale, complex projects with extensive data requirements. The results indicate that SP is competitive in relation with established ELN tools, ranking second among the six alternatives evaluated. The adapted version of SP proves particularly effective for managing data in engineering research projects involving both academic and industrial partners, accommodating datasets for around 1000 samples. The practical implementation of SP is demonstrated through a collaborative engineering research project, showing its use in everyday research tasks such as data documentation, workflow automation, and data export. The study highlights the benefits and usability of the adapted SP version, including its support for regulatory compliance and reproducibility in research workflows. In addition, limitations and lessons learned are discussed, providing insights into the potential and challenges of using SP as an ELN tool in collaborative research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Feldhoff & Tim Opatz & Hajo Wiemer & Martin Zinner & Steffen Ihlenfeldt, 2025. "Benchmarking and Lessons Learned from Using SharePoint as an Electronic Lab Notebook in Engineering Joint Research Projects," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-31, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:92-:d:1683477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/7/92/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/7/92/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:92-:d:1683477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.