IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v10y2025i7p105-d1691993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert Experiences in Anonymizing Personal Data and Its Use as Open Data: Qualitative Insights

Author

Listed:
  • Norbert Lichtenauer

    (Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Health Campus Bad Kötzting, 93444 Bad Kötzting, Germany)

  • Johann Guggumos

    (Faculty of Law, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Matthias Kampmann

    (IT-Sicherheitscluster e.V., 93053 Regensburg, Germany)

  • Juliane Kis

    (IT-Sicherheitscluster e.V., 93053 Regensburg, Germany)

  • Florian Laumer

    (PASSION4IT GmbH, 94234 Viechtach, Germany)

  • Elena März

    (Faculty of Law, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Florian Wahl

    (Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Technology Campus Grafenau, 94481 Grafenau, Germany)

  • Sebastian Wilhelm

    (Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Technology Campus Grafenau, 94481 Grafenau, Germany)

Abstract

Introduction : The effective and meaningful use of anonymized personal data, including open data, is globally significant across various sectors. Enhancing data utilization aims to generate substantial societal benefits and added value through innovations, products, and services. However, several legal, ethical, and technical challenges currently hinder the development and broader adoption of open data. Furthermore, the availability of technical support tools with high usability is especially desirable to facilitate the anonymization process effectively. Methods : As part of the EAsyAnon research project, preliminary insights were gathered through a scoping review that identified factors promoting or impeding the anonymization and use of personal data. Based on these findings, a structured interview guide was developed. Following a pretest, 19 interviews were conducted with diverse stakeholders from healthcare institutions, research organizations, public authorities, and private companies. The collected data were analyzed using Kuckartz’s structural content analysis methodology, supported by qualitative analysis software. Results : The content analysis yielded five overarching categories and 21 subcategories. These encompassed stakeholder experiences related to anonymization and open data processes, the various types and formats of personal data, identified barriers and enabling factors, support services, and the ethical and legal considerations associated with anonymization. Discussion : The findings highlight significant uncertainty among stakeholders regarding the anonymization of personal data. Although the importance and potential applications of open data for innovation and continuous improvement are widely acknowledged and supported, numerous challenges persist at both the macro and micro levels. The results emphasize a clear need for targeted support measures to address these challenges effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Norbert Lichtenauer & Johann Guggumos & Matthias Kampmann & Juliane Kis & Florian Laumer & Elena März & Florian Wahl & Sebastian Wilhelm, 2025. "Expert Experiences in Anonymizing Personal Data and Its Use as Open Data: Qualitative Insights," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:105-:d:1691993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/7/105/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/7/105/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:105-:d:1691993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.