IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v10y2025i11p169-d1778880.html

Toward Responsible AI in High-Stakes Domains: A Dataset for Building Static Analysis with LLMs in Structural Engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Avila

    (Grupo de Investigación de Energía, Minas y Agua (GIEMA), Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Construcción, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador)

  • Daniel Ilbay

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Construcción, Ingeniería Civil, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador)

  • Paola Tapia

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Construcción, Ingeniería Civil, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador)

  • David Rivera

    (Facultad de Ciencias, Ingeniería y Construcción, Ingeniería Civil, Universidad UTE, Quito 170527, Ecuador)

Abstract

Modern engineering increasingly operates within socio-technical networks, such as the interdependence of energy grids, transport systems, and building codes, where decisions must be reliable and transparent. Large language models (LLMs) such as GPT promise efficiency by interpreting domain-specific queries and generating outputs, yet their predictive nature can introduce biases or fabricated values—risks that are unacceptable in structural engineering, where safety and compliance are paramount. This work presents a dataset that embeds generative AI into validated computational workflows through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). MCP enables API-based integration between ChatGPT (GPT-4o) and numerical solvers by converting natural-language prompts into structured solver commands. This creates context-aware exchanges—for example, transforming a query on seismic drift limits into an OpenSees analysis—whose results are benchmarked against manually generated ETABS models. This architecture ensures traceability, reproducibility, and alignment with seismic design standards. The dataset contains prompts, GPT outputs, solver-based analyses, and comparative error metrics for four reinforced concrete frame models designed under Ecuadorian (NEC-15) and U.S. (ASCE 7-22) codes. The end-to-end runtime for these scenarios, including LLM prompting, MCP orchestration, and solver execution, ranged between 6 and 12 s, demonstrating feasibility for design and verification workflows. Beyond providing records, the dataset establishes a reproducible methodology for integrating LLMs into engineering practice, with three goals: enabling independent verification, fostering collaboration across AI and civil engineering, and setting benchmarks for responsible AI use in high-stakes domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Avila & Daniel Ilbay & Paola Tapia & David Rivera, 2025. "Toward Responsible AI in High-Stakes Domains: A Dataset for Building Static Analysis with LLMs in Structural Engineering," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:11:p:169-:d:1778880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/11/169/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/11/169/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:11:p:169-:d:1778880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.