IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcommo/v5y2025i1p1-d1823648.html

Revisiting Boi Gordo Index Futures: Long-Run Daily Data, Structural Breaks, and a Comparative Evaluation of Classical and Machine Learning Time-Series Models

Author

Listed:
  • Renata G. Alcoforado

    (Department of Accounting and Actuarial Science, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil
    ISEG Research, ISEG Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal
    Chaire ACTIONS & Institut de Mathématique de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, 13003 Marseille, France)

  • Hudo L. S. G. Alcoforado

    (Department of Computer Science, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife 52171-900, Brazil)

  • Alfredo D. Egídio dos Reis

    (ISEG Research, ISEG Lisbon School of Economics & Management, Universidade de Lisboa, 1200-781 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Pedro A. d. L. Tenório

    (Department of Accounting and Actuarial Science, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil)

Abstract

We study one of the world’s largest cattle markets by revisiting and extending previous work on the forecasting of Brazil’s Boi Gordo Index (BGI). Using an updated daily dataset (July 2006–September 2025, inflation-adjusted), we evaluate classical and machine learning (ML) approaches for price prediction. Methods include Exponential Smoothing (Simple, Holt, and Holt–Winters), ARMA/ARIMA/SARIMA, GARMA variants, GARCH, Theta, Prophet, and XGBoost; models are compared under a strictly chronological 90/10 holdout (~476 test days) using RMSE, MAE, and MSE, with the AIC guiding within-family selection. Results show that, for the full out-of-sample window, GARMA delivers the best overall accuracy, with ARMA and Holt–Winters close behind, while Prophet and XGBoost perform comparatively worse in this volatile setting. Performance is horizon-dependent: in the first 180 test days, prior to the late-2024 level shift, Holt attains the lowest RMSE/MSE, and XGBoost achieves the lowest MAE. No method anticipates the October–November 2024 exogenous jump and subsequent correction, highlighting the difficulty of structural breaks and the need for timely re-specification. We conclude that GARMA is a robust default for long, turbulent windows, whereas smoothing and ML methods can be competitive on shorter horizons. These findings inform risk measurement and risk mitigation strategies in Brazil’s cattle futures market.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata G. Alcoforado & Hudo L. S. G. Alcoforado & Alfredo D. Egídio dos Reis & Pedro A. d. L. Tenório, 2025. "Revisiting Boi Gordo Index Futures: Long-Run Daily Data, Structural Breaks, and a Comparative Evaluation of Classical and Machine Learning Time-Series Models," Commodities, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcommo:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:1-:d:1823648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2432/5/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2813-2432/5/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcommo:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:1-:d:1823648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.