Author
Listed:
- Jhoan Sebastián Valderrama-Vélez
(GIIEN—Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Energía, Faculty of Engineering, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín 050034, Colombia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Karen Lemmel-Vélez
(GIIEN—Grupo de Investigación e Innovación en Energía, Faculty of Engineering, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín 050034, Colombia
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Juan Camilo Mazo-Arenas
(GIIAM—Grupo de Investigación e Innovación Ambiental, Faculty of Engineering, Institución Universitaria Pascual Bravo, Medellín 050034, Colombia)
- Carlos David Zuluaga-Ríos
(GIGEE—Grupo de Investigación en Gestión de la Energía Eléctrica, Faculty of Engineering, Institución Universitaria ITM, Medellín 050034, Colombia)
Abstract
Reliable experimental platforms are essential for lithium-ion (Li-Ion) battery characterization, equivalent circuit model (ECM) identification, and state-of-charge (SOC) estimator validation. However, access to commercial battery cyclers and high-end instrumentation can be limited in academic and applied research environments, which motivates the development of low-cost and reproducible test benches. This work presents the development and validation of a low-cost experimental platform for Li-Ion battery characterization, SOC-dependent ECM identification, voltage model validation, and SOC estimator assessment. The proposed platform integrates constant-current–constant-voltage (CC-CV) charging, a controlled-current electronic load implemented on a printed circuit board (PCB), ESP32-based embedded acquisition, and MATLAB-based data processing. A Samsung INR18650-35E cell was characterized through full-discharge tests at different C-rates, pulse discharge tests (PDTs), and dynamic current profiles. The measured capacity at 0.2C was 3345.1 mAh, showing close agreement with the manufacturer-reported minimum nominal capacity of 3350 mAh. First- and second-order Thévenin ECMs were identified from PDT data, parameterized as SOC-dependent models, and validated under Scaled Dynamic Stress Test (DST) and Modified Pulsed Dynamic Stress Test (P-DST) profiles. The second-order ECM identified from the most complete PDT dataset achieved voltage RMSE values of 23.24 mV and 12.14 mV under the DST and P-DST profiles, respectively. The platform was further used to evaluate SOC estimators based on extended Kalman filters (EKF) and a hybrid Extended Kalman Filter-Artificial Neural Network (EKF-ANN) residual correction method. The EKF based on the second-order ECM achieved SOC RMSE values of 0.5088 % and 1.0890 % under the complete dynamic profiles, while the hybrid EKF-ANN reduced the RMSE to 0.2276 % and 0.2788 % over the dynamic test blocks. These results show that the proposed platform provides an accessible experimental framework for connecting battery testing, ECM identification, voltage validation, and BMS-oriented SOC estimator evaluation within a single reproducible workflow.
Suggested Citation
Jhoan Sebastián Valderrama-Vélez & Karen Lemmel-Vélez & Juan Camilo Mazo-Arenas & Carlos David Zuluaga-Ríos, 2026.
"Low-Cost Experimental Validation of Lithium-Ion Battery Models and SOC Estimators Under Dynamic Current Profiles,"
Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-35, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:122-:d:2008832
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:122-:d:2008832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.