Adaptive Energy Stations for Sustainable Transport Infrastructure: Real-Time Dispatch Optimization Using Marginal Grid Emissions and Low-Carbon Fuel Pathways

Transport decarbonization requires infrastructure that can use time-resolved carbon information without overstating the representativeness of short proof-of-method runs. This study introduces Adaptive Energy Stations (AESs), multi-fuel transport-energy nodes that integrate marginal grid-emission signals, fuel life-cycle carbon intensities, wholesale electricity prices, and vehicle operating constraints into a station-level dispatch optimization. The implemented case is a one-week winter proof-of-method for CAISO/CAISO_NORTH using 168 hourly service events over 1–8 January 2026 Pacific time, archived WattTime marginal operating emissions, CAISO locational marginal prices, eGRID CAMX annual-average factors, and declared vehicle and fuel-pathway parameters. In the audited CAISO scenario, the attached dispatch outputs report a reduction from 181.76 to 123.38 g CO 2 e/km relative to the specified static baseline, corresponding to a 32.12% reduction for the one-week winter service-event stream. The populated dispatch trace shows that the carbon-priority AES plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV) run selected cellulosic E85 for all 168 events and selected no electric events; this result is interpreted as an operational scenario result for the archived week, not as an annual fleet-average, smart-charging benefit, or deployment forecast. The revised analysis explicitly separates implemented CAISO evidence from ERCOT, MISO-MROW, and ISO–NE extension sensitivities, which remain hypothetical until equivalent marginal-emissions, price, and service-event data are supplied. Battery-production amortization is treated as a separate sensitivity because it can change battery electric vehicle (BEV)–cellulosic E85 equivalence conclusions: at 50–100 kg CO 2 e/kWh over 240,000 km, a 75 kWh BEV pack contributes 15.6–31.3 g CO 2 e/km and a 14 kWh PHEV pack contributes 2.9–5.8 g CO 2 e/km. Practical-equivalence claims are therefore conditional on the declared boundary, equivalence margin, and production-emissions treatment. Full deployment requires validated marginal-emission access, transparent dispatch-audit outputs, supply-chain verification, user-behavior characterization, cost sensitivity analysis, and cybersecurity safeguards.