IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v8y2026i4p113-d1998432.html

Powering the Green Transition in Quad-Sectors with Hybrid Clean Energy Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Helena M. Ramos

    (Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Chetan Rishi

    (Civil Engineering Research and Innovation for Sustainability (CERIS), Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Oscar E. Coronado-Hernández

    (Instituto de Hidráulica y Saneamiento Ambiental, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena 130001, Colombia)

  • Modesto Pérez-Sánchez

    (Hydraulic Engineering and Environmental Department, Universitat Politècnica de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain)

  • Paul Coughlan

    (Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, College Green, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland)

  • Aonghus McNabola

    (School of Engineering, RMIT University, 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

Abstract

Hybrid renewable energy systems (HRESs) represent a promising strategy for reducing carbon emissions across multiple sectors by integrating complementary resources such as solar, wind, hydropower, and energy storage technologies. Identifying the most suitable location for a pilot installation requires a comprehensive evaluation that balances technical performance, environmental benefits, social considerations, and economic feasibility. This study employs an enhanced multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework, supported by machine learning (ML) techniques, to assess four pilot sites developed within the HY4RES project: a rural community, an aquaculture facility, a port installation, and an agriculture network. A comprehensive set of key performance indicators (KPIs) was established to capture technical, environmental, social, and economic dimensions. These include the degree of hybridization, carbon intensity, community benefit scores, net present value, levelized cost of energy, and payback period. After collecting and normalizing the site-specific data, ML EL-SVM, decision tree, and logistic regression models as computational surrogates designed to bypass the multi-step, matrix inversion mathematical requirements of the AHP when screening massive numbers of future scenario outputs supporting consistency checks and sensitivity exploration were used, along with criterion adjustments, to refine the relative importance of each KPI. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to assess potential factors and rank the sites, with the rural site achieving the highest overall score in the system, driven by its complex four-source hybrid configuration and strong community-level benefits. The agriculture scheme ranked second, demonstrating significant potential for carbon emission reductions. The port pilot placed third, distinguished by high technical innovation but more limited social impact. The aquaculture site ranked fourth, primarily due to environmental scores, despite its economic self-sufficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Helena M. Ramos & Chetan Rishi & Oscar E. Coronado-Hernández & Modesto Pérez-Sánchez & Paul Coughlan & Aonghus McNabola, 2026. "Powering the Green Transition in Quad-Sectors with Hybrid Clean Energy Technologies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:113-:d:1998432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/8/4/113/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/8/4/113/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:4:p:113-:d:1998432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.