IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jcltec/v8y2026i1p13-d1839420.html

Efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Wastewater from Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling

Author

Listed:
  • Ronja Wagner-Wenz

    (Fraunhofer IWKS, Brentanostraße 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany
    Institute IWAR, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
    Institute of Material Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Frederik Funk

    (Department of environmental Process Engineering, Technical University Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Regine Peter

    (Fraunhofer IWKS, Brentanostraße 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany)

  • Tobias Necke

    (Fraunhofer IWKS, Brentanostraße 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany)

  • Fabian Brückner

    (Fraunhofer IWKS, Brentanostraße 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany)

  • Maximilian Philipp

    (Berliner Wasserbetriebe, Neue Jüdenstraße 1, 10179 Berlin, Germany)

  • Markus Engelhart

    (Institute IWAR, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
    Institute of Material Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Anke Weidenkaff

    (Institute IWAR, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
    Institute of Material Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

  • Emanuel Ionescu

    (Fraunhofer IWKS, Brentanostraße 2a, 63755 Alzenau, Germany
    Institute IWAR, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
    Institute of Material Science, Technical University Darmstadt, Karolinenplatz 5, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany)

Abstract

A treatment process was developed for effluents from direct physical lithium-ion battery (LIB) recycling with a focus on the removal of organic contaminants. The high chemical oxygen demand to biological oxygen demand ratio (COD/BOD 5 ) of 3.9–4.6 indicates that biological treatment is not feasible. Therefore, three advanced oxidation processes were evaluated: UV/H 2 O 2 oxidation, the Fenton process and electrochemical oxidation. Two target scenarios were considered, namely compliance with the limit for discharge into the sewer system (COD = 800 mg/L) and compliance with the stricter limit for direct discharge into surface waters (COD = 200 mg/L). Under the investigated conditions, UV/H 2 O 2 oxidation and the Fenton process did not meet the required discharge limits and exhibited high chemical consumption. In contrast, electrochemical oxidation achieved both discharge criteria with a lower energy demand, requiring 32.8 kWh/kgCOD removed for sewer discharge and 95.3 kWh/kgCOD removed for direct discharge. An economic assessment further identified electrochemical oxidation as the most cost-effective option, with treatment costs of EUR 6.63/m 3 , compared to EUR 17.31/m 3 for UV/H 2 O 2 oxidation and EUR 28.66/m 3 for the Fenton process. Overall, electrochemical oxidation proved to be the most efficient and environmentally favorable technology for treating wastewater from LIB recycling, enabling compliance with strict discharge regulations while minimizing the chemical and energy demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronja Wagner-Wenz & Frederik Funk & Regine Peter & Tobias Necke & Fabian Brückner & Maximilian Philipp & Markus Engelhart & Anke Weidenkaff & Emanuel Ionescu, 2026. "Efficiency of Advanced Oxidation Processes for Treating Wastewater from Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:1:p:13-:d:1839420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/8/1/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8797/8/1/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jcltec:v:8:y:2026:i:1:p:13-:d:1839420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.