IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v16y2025i4p54-d1788259.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflecting on Social Inclusion Through Philosophical Discussion: A Sustainable Partnership Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Peter R. J. Trim

    (Birkbeck Business School, Birkbeck, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK)

  • Richard C. L. Trim

    (University College London, UCL East Campus, One Pool Street, 1 Pool Street, London, E20 2AF, UK)

Abstract

The 17 sustainable development goals advocated by the United Nations have played a big role in focusing the minds of policy makers in terms of sustainability issues and have also highlighted the issue of social inclusion and the need to make society more equitable. As well as referencing the sustainable development goals, attention is given to the planetary health concept as it is known to deepen our understanding of the ecological interdependence brought about by cultural, environmental and socio-economic factors, which have relevance in terms of mankind achieving the sustainable development goals. This paper addresses the following question: How can a framework to foster global partnerships leading to sustainable development be underpinned by a philosophical argument that strengthens the case for social inclusion? Consequently, a wide body of literature is reviewed, with key concepts such as collaboration being placed in context and reinforced through stakeholder theory. A philosophical discussion is entered into embracing Moore’s open question argument regarding the reliance on Intuitionism to explain how actions can be coined as immoral or moral. Such arguments are useful for raising moral issues that often end in moral disagreements, and which raise and help solve ethical problems. To effectively deal with the complexity involved, policy makers should support the use of frameworks that can be used to support and encourage social inclusion. In adopting this viewpoint, we put forward a sustainable partnership framework that provides guidance to policy makers and their advisors in terms of tackling the issue of social inclusion. In order to achieve social inclusion, policy makers need to understand the role that symbolic representation plays and how the influence of major influencers generates collaborative knowledge that is reappraised through philosophical argument. The outcome of the philosophical argument is a change in a nation’s cultural value system and the implementation of social inclusion policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter R. J. Trim & Richard C. L. Trim, 2025. "Reflecting on Social Inclusion Through Philosophical Discussion: A Sustainable Partnership Framework," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:54-:d:1788259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/4/54/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/4/54/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:54-:d:1788259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.