IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v16y2025i3p38-d1716861.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Piloting a Virtual Mindful Eating Program to Improve Eating Behaviors and Reduce Food Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Michael F. Royer

    (School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA)

  • Afton Kechter

    (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA)

  • Dara L. James

    (Social Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA)

  • Margaret Moeller

    (College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

  • Maricarmen Vizcaino

    (Swette Center for Sustainable Food Systems, Arizona State University, Walton Center for Planetary Health, 777 East University Dr., Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

  • Christopher Wharton

    (College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA)

Abstract

Introduction: The wellbeing of humans and the planet is negatively impacted by unhealthy eating behaviors and excessive food waste. Mindfulness approaches have the potential to help people modify their behavior to achieve healthier outcomes. Pilot testing methods to sustainably support healthy eating and reduce food waste are essential for identifying effective ways to promote human and planetary health. Methods: A pilot study was conducted to test a virtual mindful eating program to improve eating behaviors and reduce food waste among a small sample of U.S. adults. Mixed-methods approaches were used to identify the efficacy of the piloted intervention on mindfulness, eating behaviors, and food waste while identifying participant perspectives of the mindful eating program. Results: Quantitative study outcomes indicated positive intervention effects on hunger/satiety cues and food appreciation. No significant intervention effects were detected on mindfulness or food waste. Qualitative findings highlighted participant reports of experiencing greater self-awareness, an improved relationship with food, and a sense of creativity with meal preparation. Conclusions: This pilot study tested a novel mindful eating program that improved eating behaviors related to hunger/satiety and increased food appreciation. The program was accepted by participants, but it did not increase mindfulness or reduce food waste. Future iterations of this mindful eating program will require modifications to test different approaches for increasing mindfulness and reducing food waste while expanding the positive effects on healthy eating.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael F. Royer & Afton Kechter & Dara L. James & Margaret Moeller & Maricarmen Vizcaino & Christopher Wharton, 2025. "Piloting a Virtual Mindful Eating Program to Improve Eating Behaviors and Reduce Food Waste," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:38-:d:1716861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/3/38/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/16/3/38/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell, Sally V. & Young, C. William & Unsworth, Kerrie L. & Robinson, Cheryl, 2017. "Bringing habits and emotions into food waste behaviour," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-114.
    2. Kelly Cosgrove & Christopher Wharton, 2023. "Food Appreciation Scale Development and Dimensionality Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-10, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dang Vu, Hoai Nam & Nielsen, Martin Reinhardt, 2022. "Understanding determinants of the intention to buy rhino horn in Vietnam through the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    2. Wei Zheng & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei & Xihua Zhang, 2022. "Landscape and Unique Fascination: A Dual-Case Study on the Antecedents of Tourist Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intentions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Alexandria M. Gain & Leonard V. Coote & André Bonfrer, 2024. "Conceptualising and measuring consumer perceptions of brand wastefulness," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(6), pages 557-575, November.
    4. Francesco La Barbera & Mario Amato & Roberta Riverso & Fabio Verneau, 2022. "Social Emotions and Good Provider Norms in Tackling Household Food Waste: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Nik Masdek Nik Rozana & Wong Kelly Kai Seng & Mohd Nawi Nolila & Sharifuddin Juwaidah & Wong Wang Li, 2023. "Antecedents of sustainable food waste management behaviour: Empirical evidence from urban households in Malaysia," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 53-77, March.
    6. Sania Zafar & Ehsan Ullah & Syed Asif Ali Naqvi & Sofia Anwar & Bilal Hussain, 2025. "Assessment of Self-reported Food Waste from Households via Two Routes in Pakistan," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(2), pages 8961-8982, June.
    7. Tang, Honghong & Li, Lin & Su, Song, 2022. "Experiencing less leads to the use of more: The effect of a scarcity mindset on product usage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 139-148.
    8. Hu, Saiquan & Jia, Xiao & Zhang, Xiaojin & Zheng, Xiaoying & Zhu, Junming, 2017. "How political ideology affects climate perception: Moderation effects of time orientation and knowledge," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 124-131.
    9. Christina Marouli, 2024. "Food waste interventions: Barriers on the way to sustainable food systems," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 367-380, February.
    10. Alysia Wakefield & Stephen Axon, 2024. "Scaling the Food Mountain: Implications for Addressing the Determinants of Consumer Food Waste Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Natasha Juliana & Suddin Lada & Brahim Chekima & Azaze-Azizi Abdul Adis, 2022. "Exploring Determinants Shaping Recycling Behavior Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Model: An Empirical Study of Households in Sabah, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-13, April.
    12. Obuobi, Bright & Liu, ChenGuang & Awuah, Faustina & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Nketiah, Emmanuel, 2025. "Comparing energy conservation behavior from the perspective of the karma effect," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    13. Walaa Al Husban, 2025. "The Impact of Integrating Sustainable Development Goals on Students’ Awareness and Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Case Study of Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    14. Maria-Georgeta Moldovan & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Liana Stanca & Cristina Bianca Pocol, 2024. "A Qualitative Study on the Consumer Behaviour Related to Food Waste: Romanian Perspectives through Word Cloud and Sentiment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    15. Theodora Kritikou & Dimosthenis Panagiotakos & Konstantinos Abeliotis & Katia Lasaridi, 2021. "Investigating the Determinants of Greek Households Food Waste Prevention Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Yadav, Rambalak & Bilgihan, Anil & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "What drives diners' eco-friendly behaviour? The moderating role of planning routine," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    17. Panpan Zhang & Shaopeng Fu & Xiaojie Liu, 2022. "The Effect of Plate and Decoration Color on Consumer Food Waste in Restaurants: A Case of Four Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Qiao Sun & Hailin Yao & Chang Wang & Yanfang Xiang & Jing Ma, 2024. "Why Residents Don’t Do What They Say: Exploring the Intention–Behavior Gap in E-Waste Online Recycling Participating," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-17, September.
    19. Staudacher, Myriam K. & Decker, Alexander J., 2021. "Guidelines für erfolgreiches Marketing von digitalen Lösungen gegen Lebensmittelverschwendung zur Ansprache von Generation Z in Deutschland," PraxisWISSEN Marketing: German Journal of Marketing, AfM – Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Marketing, vol. 6(01/2021), pages 25-55.
    20. Congiu, Luca & Botta, Enrico & Zoli, Mariangela, 2025. "Biases and nudges in the circular economy: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:16:y:2025:i:3:p:38-:d:1716861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.