IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v15y2024i2p20-d1376825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Socio-Spatial Distribution and Equity of Access to Urban Parks: A Case Study of Bengaluru, India

Author

Listed:
  • Nilanjan Bhor

    (School of Human Development, Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Bengaluru 560080, India)

  • Dhananjayan Mayavel

    (Geospatial Lab, Indian Institute for Human Settlements, Bengaluru 560080, India)

Abstract

Given the effect of urbanization on land use and the allocation and implementation of urban green spaces, this paper attempts to analyze the distribution and accessibility of public parks in India’s Bengaluru city (previously known as Bangalore). Availability, accessibility, and utilization—the key measures of Urban Green Spaces (UGS)—are mostly used in health research and policy and are important components of Planetary Health Equity in the context of studying UGSs and health. A geo-spatial method was used for mapping the park’s distribution and measuring its accessibility, using road network data. To understand equitable access to the parks, four socio-economic parameters—population density, the percentage of the population below 6 years of age, the proxy wealth index, and scheduled caste population—were correlated with the parks’ accessibility. This spatial distribution revealed that 19 of 198 wards did not have a single park and that 36 wards only had one park. About 25–29% of wards did not have accessibility to neighborhood-level and community-level parks within a 400–800 m distance. These parks must be accessible within a walking distance of 400–800 m but were found to most likely be inaccessible on the periphery of the city where the population density is low and the children population is high, in comparison to the central part of the city. Similarly, parks were found to be inaccessible in the eastern part of the city where the scheduled caste population is high and also found to be inaccessible for the low-income neighborhoods residing in the western part and southern periphery of the city, indicating the uneven distribution of and inequitable access to public parks. Our study proposes a reshaping of both neighborhood parks and community parks in an attempt to look beyond biodiversity, through the planetary health equity approach, by noting that, while biodiversity indirectly has a positive effect on health, public parks should not only be considered as advancing environmental sustainability and climate resilience, but also as improving the health and wellbeing of the population. Affirmative action in terms of the availability of public parks with adequate area requirements and essential services at a neighborhood scale is required to redress the inequity of access; in addition, the accessibility of parks must be considered important during urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilanjan Bhor & Dhananjayan Mayavel, 2024. "The Socio-Spatial Distribution and Equity of Access to Urban Parks: A Case Study of Bengaluru, India," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:20-:d:1376825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/2/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/15/2/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Farfán Gutiérrez & Andrew Boni Noguez & Alejandro Flamenco-Sandoval & Ayesa Martínez Serrano & Arnoldo Flores-Torres & Ana Karen Godínez Ramírez & Camilo Alcántara, 2021. "Availability and accessibility of urban green spaces: the case of the urban zone of Queretaro Metropolitan Area, Mexico," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 101-105, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan He & Zixuan Chen & Shaowei Ai & Jing Zhou & Linlin Lu & Ting Yang, 2021. "The Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Urban Cultural and Entertainment Facilities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Mahmood AKBARI, 2022. "ANALYSIS OF GREEN SPACES IN THE REGIONS OF SHIRAZ METROPOLIS, IRAN Abstract: Urban parks and green spaces are considered among the most fundamental factors of sustainability in the accelerating growth," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(4), pages 52-67, November.
    3. Tianrong Xu & Nikmatul Adha Nordin & Ainoriza Mohd Aini, 2022. "Urban Green Space and Subjective Well-Being of Older People: A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-29, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:20-:d:1376825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.