IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v14y2023i2p22-d1128290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reemergence of Monkeypox in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Nzube Ekpunobi

    (Department of Microbiology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria)

  • Oluwamayowa Akinsuyi

    (Department of Microbiology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria)

  • Theresa Ariri

    (Department of Microbiology, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria)

  • Temitope Ogunmola

    (Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Technology Akure (FUTA), Akure, Nigeria)

Abstract

The emergence and reemergence of infectious diseases caused by viruses continue to be a major public health concern globally, affecting both humans and animals. One such disease is monkeypox, a zoonotic infection caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV) that has recurred in sub-Saharan Africa over several decades. Notably, the 2022 outbreak of monkeypox in Nigeria follows a deadly outbreak in 2017, which was preceded by the disease’s first recorded outbreak in 1978. Epidemiological investigations in 2017 showed no apparent link between human monkeypox cases and the outbreak that year, indicating the potential existence of multiple sources of the virus and limited human-to-human transmission. This underscores the presence of an alternative ecological niche in humans. Furthermore, in some communities in Nigeria, monkeys are regarded as sacred and not hunted or consumed, leading to their proliferation and increased likelihood of MPXV transmission. This mini-review focuses on the occurrence, epidemiological distribution, geographical distribution, endemicity, and possible solutions to reduce the spread of human monkeypox in Nigeria. The implications of this reemergence and the need for effective public health measures to prevent and control outbreaks of monkeypox are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Nzube Ekpunobi & Oluwamayowa Akinsuyi & Theresa Ariri & Temitope Ogunmola, 2023. "The Reemergence of Monkeypox in Nigeria," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-8, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:22-:d:1128290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/2/22/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/2/22/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amy Maxmen, 2020. "How blood from coronavirus survivors might save lives," Nature, Nature, vol. 580(7801), pages 16-17, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:22-:d:1128290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.