IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v14y2023i2p21-d1127398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Medical Equipment Lifecycle Framework to Improve Healthcare Policy and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Bruce Mang

    (College of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA)

  • YeonJae Oh

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada)

  • Chabelly Bonilla

    (College of Arts and Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA)

  • Jennifer Orth

    (College of Arts and Sciences, Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ 07079, USA
    International Rotary Fellowship of Healthcare Professionals: Re-MERGE.)

Abstract

The healthcare sector is struggling to become more environmentally friendly compared to other industries, evidently seen by the contribution to global emissions. These struggles have elicited some research on sustainable methods regarding the lifecycle of medical devices. Indeed, the World Health Organization (WHO) encourages the reuse of equipment and ethical donations, namely for the sake of the environment and sustainable global health. However, there is a lack of synthesis–multiple greener alternatives to the current healthcare system are developing without a connection to each other, hindering an increase in sustainability. Thus, there is a lack of global organization and standardization in medical equipment lifecycles. Inspired by the findings and guidelines of the Safe and Sustainable Medical Equipment Supply Subgroup (SASMES) of the International Rotary Fellowship of Healthcare Professionals, we created the Re-processing Medical Equipment: Rotarian Research Group for the Environment (Re-MERGE) to expand on these challenges. Re-MERGE follows the life cycle of medical devices in the United States of America through its initial stages of classification and various regulatory pathways, the middle stage of post-market requirements, and the end stage of disposal or donation and reprocessing. Our findings indicate that current medical device end-stages are inefficient, damaging to the environment, and burdensome to donation recipients; however, existing processes can provide improvements to medical device end-stage methods by drastically reducing environmental damage, improving healthcare globally, and increasing sustainability in the field. We identify that more research is needed to connect the implications of different medical device end stages. Additionally, we encourage the findings to be implemented to create more sustainable, effective methods of medical device disposal, donation, and reprocessing.

Suggested Citation

  • Bruce Mang & YeonJae Oh & Chabelly Bonilla & Jennifer Orth, 2023. "A Medical Equipment Lifecycle Framework to Improve Healthcare Policy and Sustainability," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:21-:d:1127398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/2/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/2/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:21-:d:1127398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.