IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fru/finjrn/260401p8-26.html

Mind the Gap: An Empirical Analysis of Mutual Fund Returns, Behavioral Factors, and Investment Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander E. Abramov

    (RANEPA, Moscow, Russian Federation)

  • Maria I. Chernova

    (RANEPA, Moscow, Russian Federation)

  • Maria S. Zaretskaya

    (RANEPA, Moscow, Russian Federation)

Abstract

In a highly volatile financial market, investors in mutual funds frequently encounter a discrepancy — a gap — between their actual personal investment returns and the fund’s time-weighted performance. This study aims to quantify the magnitude of this gap and identify its primary drivers within the Russian market. The research is based on a sample of 506 open-ended equity and bond funds covering January 2005 to August 2025 and 83 exchange-traded equity and bond funds covering January 2021 to August 2025. The findings indicate that in open-ended equity funds, investors underperformed the funds by an average of 0.87 percentage points (p.p.) per annum, while in open-ended bond funds, the gap amounted to 0.29 p.p. Market timing was identified as the predominant explanatory factor for this gap in open-ended funds, with its scale significantly influenced by market volatility, fund size, and the RUONIA rate. While timing effects were central, the influence of past returns also exerted a negative impact on investor outcomes. Conversely, in exchange-traded funds, investor returns averaged higher than fund returns (yielding negative gaps of −0.31 p.p. for bonds and −1.39 p.p. for equities), a phenomenon potentially attributed to market-maker activities. A comparative analysis of capital allocation strategies over time demonstrates that money-cost averaging and value averaging are the most profitable and resilient strategies, consistently outperforming observed irregular investment patterns. The study concludes that irrational behavior and speculative market-timing attempts lead to systematic return losses. When underlying assets are highly volatile, long-term investors are advised to employ regular contribution strategies to mitigate behavioral risks. Information about the return gap can be used to promote more rational investment behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander E. Abramov & Maria I. Chernova & Maria S. Zaretskaya, 2026. "Mind the Gap: An Empirical Analysis of Mutual Fund Returns, Behavioral Factors, and Investment Strategies," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 8-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:260401:p:8-26
    DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2026-4-8-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.finjournal-nifi.ru/images/FILES/Journal/Archive/2026/4/statii/01_4_2026_v18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31107/2075-1990-2026-4-8-26?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
    • D14 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Saving; Personal Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fru:finjrn:260401:p:8-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gennady Ageev (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frigvru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.